More Too Late Movie Reviews. Resurrected Post.
I don���t get to the movie theater much, maybe once a year. So movies are a home affair, on variety of screen sizes, and generally a matter of compromise. As I was, temporarily, a bachelor this weekend, I was able to skip compromise and select whatever I wanted. Accordingly I caught up on a few genre films. I have some thoughts on what I watched.
The first in the lineup was ���Star Wars: The Force Awakens.��� My history with Star Wars is checkered. I saw the first one in the theater at the age of eight, probably ideal. The film had an impact, as did the second two, though to a lesser degree. I���d say Brian Daley���s Han Solo books made a greater impression than Empire and Jedi. The first short story I recall writing was the imaginatively titled ���Han Solo and The Boy.��� (After writing it I felt somewhat guilty, realizing somehow it was a larcenous endeavor, so I went back and changed all the names.) I saw the films a few times again over the years, but seldom. The affection was more a matter of fond memories than anything else. Watching them again years later I found the dialog hokey and much of it rather absurd. The later trilogy sapped most of the remaining goodwill ��� though not all: I fulfilled the hopes of my early short story writing effort by scripting a comic book short story for ���Star Wars Tales.��� It was nothing more than a two-page gag, but it was published Star Wars work.
So, I approached ���The Force Awakens��� with less enthusiasm than perhaps I should have. I think I might have enjoyed it more if I���d seen it in the theater with an audience and fed off of the collective experience. But instead I watched it alone, my critical authorial faculties engaged. I should highlight the positives: seeing old, familiar characters again. That was nice. But the rest came across as an absurdly high-budget fan film. See, what made the first Star Wars film work was its unabashed embrace of bygone films, of the old cliff-hanger serials, 40���s and 50���s westerns. Two-fisted good guy against malevolent bad guys. The same kind of story telling that made ���Indiana Jones��� work. The problem with ���The Force Awakens��� is that it attempts to be a piece of modern story telling. And that just doesn���t work. At least, it didn���t for me. Obviously I���m in a distinct minority. That���s fine. I���m glad the rest of you enjoyed it. My experience should not in the least detract from the pleasure you derived from the movie.
I followed Star Wars with ���Star Trek Beyond.��� Now, I���m willing to admit this is in many ways a lesser film. Yet, perhaps because I went in with low expectations, I had a good time. It is silly, the story makes no sense, and it seems to waste the story telling possibilities offered by having a starship. But I think what made it work is the characters. There is pleasure in seeing Kirk, Spock, Scotty, and Bones interact, even if it is Faux-Kirk, Faux-Spock, etc. Credit to the acting (less so to Faux-Spock, but they can���t all be winners.) Would I watch it again? No. But it proved a fine accompaniment for lying on the couch with a couple of beers.
Last up came ���Batman vs. Superman: Dawn of Justice.��� Again I went in with low expectations. The movie was savaged by critics. And it is glum, dour, and occasionally plodding. It is also plethoric and overwrought. But it worked. As a mishmash of The Dark Knight Returns and The Death of Superman storylines (and I guess a few others ��� I don���t really keep up on comics anymore and never read much DC to begin with) it worked as spectacle and as a comparison piece to ���Captain America: Civil War��� with its questions of how the people of a nation would respond if unfettered gods lived, walked, and wreaked the odd bit of carnage and major property damage among them.
My take, anyway. Yours might vary. And probably does.
View more on Ken Lizzi’s website ��Like ������� 0 comments ������� flag
Published on January 29, 2017 14:08
