COINTELPRO and the State of the JFK assassination
FBI astroturfing back in the 70s by funding a bunch of anarchist mags.
And sure, the Church committee exposed these things, but the astroturfing and agent provocateur stuff goes on to this day.
On that note, plenty of smart folk tell me that the things like "conspiracy behind the JFK assassination is just that" and that includes Chomsky. Yet I would think that the assassination has something about it (like the Epstein "suicide") that makes smart people go "mmmm." In fact, I sense that most people who do want to use the word conspiracy [1] for saying " well who else would have done it" when, well, who else was behind it then?
Any how, that the CIA and Biden want to keep what is essentially old news secret, only further backs the conspiracy theorists. I mean there is a small chance that the CIA just wants it to be secret because they label plenty of stuff secret just out of a show of power rather than it needing to be secret, but that's something we should take into account. Seriously? What do they have to hide. And, anyways, I'm of the mind that whatever they're protecting (themselves or some one off general who went off the reservation... which still happens btw) might not affect what we know directly but might speak to unchecked powers in our national security state (deep state, whatever).
Your thoughts?
[1] Again, why do we have the word same word for Qanon as we use for known conspiracies? I mean come on. There has to be something to describe the latter as on a different plane as the crazy.
Enjoyed it? Share it via email, facebook, twitter, or one of the buttons below (or through some other method you prefer). Thank you! As always, here's the tip jar. paypal.me/nlowhim Throw some change in there & help cover the costs of running this thing. You can use paypal or a credit card.
And sure, the Church committee exposed these things, but the astroturfing and agent provocateur stuff goes on to this day.
On that note, plenty of smart folk tell me that the things like "conspiracy behind the JFK assassination is just that" and that includes Chomsky. Yet I would think that the assassination has something about it (like the Epstein "suicide") that makes smart people go "mmmm." In fact, I sense that most people who do want to use the word conspiracy [1] for saying " well who else would have done it" when, well, who else was behind it then?
Any how, that the CIA and Biden want to keep what is essentially old news secret, only further backs the conspiracy theorists. I mean there is a small chance that the CIA just wants it to be secret because they label plenty of stuff secret just out of a show of power rather than it needing to be secret, but that's something we should take into account. Seriously? What do they have to hide. And, anyways, I'm of the mind that whatever they're protecting (themselves or some one off general who went off the reservation... which still happens btw) might not affect what we know directly but might speak to unchecked powers in our national security state (deep state, whatever).
Your thoughts?
[1] Again, why do we have the word same word for Qanon as we use for known conspiracies? I mean come on. There has to be something to describe the latter as on a different plane as the crazy.
Enjoyed it? Share it via email, facebook, twitter, or one of the buttons below (or through some other method you prefer). Thank you! As always, here's the tip jar. paypal.me/nlowhim Throw some change in there & help cover the costs of running this thing. You can use paypal or a credit card.
No comments have been added yet.
Nelson Lowhim's Blog
- Nelson Lowhim's profile
- 14 followers
Nelson Lowhim isn't a Goodreads Author
(yet),
but they
do have a blog,
so here are some recent posts imported from
their feed.
