Knowledge, Reality, and Value: Rejoinder to Huemer, Part 2

At long last, here’s my final entry!

Rejoinder to Huemer’s Response, Part 4

Suppose A does not consent. A wants you to perform only the action that benefits him while harming B; he won’t consent to the action that harms him while benefitting B (not even conditional on your doing the other action simultaneously). Now what? It looks to me like we still have the original problem.

How is this different from a person who foolishly refuses to consent to a vaccination, even though he admits that the be...