I got a call from a Facebook friend objecting to my descr...

I got a call from a Facebook friend objecting to my description of Rose's Will as upmarket fiction. "Doesn't that sound just a little conceited? Not that your book isn't better than 90% of the others out there," she said, "but it's probably a term better left to your readers to decide."


After the call, I scoured the internet for publishing terms, and indeed, by some standards, the term is controversial. What a surprise! Do I ever do anything that isn't controversial? Despite ruffling a few feathers, however, upmarket fiction has come into it's own right as a standard genre. More and more agents and publishers are requesting it.


What is upmarket fiction? Basically, it's commercial/mainstream fiction with enough literary elements to appeal to the literary reader, making it span both genres and therefore have wider appeal. It is typically a character-driven story, with vibrant language, well-developed characters, and dimension that, by turns, expresses wisdom, irony, insight, and humor.


Rose's Will is no Odyssey, but 've held it to a higher standard. Am I not entitled to use the term to describe it? What do you think?




[image error] Submit to StumbleUpon Digg This Share via email
1 like ·   •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on February 06, 2012 13:21
No comments have been added yet.