"One element that has remained consistent is my identity as a politicized person." — Rigoberto Gonzalez
If we identify as a person is important, is how we identify as a writer important? Less so? More so? Here's an interview with essayist, memoirist, poet, and editor Rigoberto Gonzalez, who describes his background this way: " I was born in California, raised in Michoacán, educated in Spanish, and then English when my family returned to the U.S. when I was ten. I come from three generations of migrant farm workers, grape pickers mostly, and until I left for college I spent summers working alongside my family harvesting grape, onion, and green beans. As you can appreciate, our working class perception of the arts was enriched with folk music, Catholicism, and storytelling. I grew up with a strong sense of myself as a Mexican, and later, in college, as a Chicano and a gay man. One element that has remained consistent is my identity as a politicized person. My family was always willing to participate in boycotts and labor strikes. The good fight is the single sensibility I have kept sacred all these years. There was also familial conflict, of course, and not much freedom in a crowded household that resorted to physical and verbal abuse as a way of channeling the frustrations that came with poverty and exhaustion."
Check out this particular moment and then dive in to the rest:
Interviewer: Taking into account the current renascent politics of American nativism and the general anti-Latino atmosphere most exemplified by Arizona's and Alabama's draconian anti-immigrant-laws and the intentional or unintentional exclusion of Latino/as from all other aspects of the broader culture, literature included (take for example the long overdue recognition of Latino/a poets in Eduardo C. Corral's recent winning of the YaleSeries of Younger Poets Award and a Whiting Writers' Award) what is the role of a Latino/a writer in our times?
RG: I prefer to identify as a gay Chicano. I also embrace other terms, like queer and Latino. I think it's important to celebrate all of this language as an antidote to the hostility, derision and fear that others are attaching to them. A writer is an activist and a citizen, and has a responsibility beyond the poem, story or novel to participate in the political arena. For some of us that means picketing and organizing protests, others take to the pen or the computer and articulate positions through essays and editorials, and some perform that activism through the classroom as teachers. Activism is defined by the individual. I understand not everyone is willing to accept the challenge, but I sure as hell know that everyone can. In any case, this is an old argument and usually the only ones who speak up are the ones who want to negate that premise for selfish reasons. At the very least, people who do not want to participate in these conversations should please cease from making such comments as "I don't want to be known as a Chicano writer" or "I don't want to be known as a gay writer." We need role models, not cowards.
Check out this particular moment and then dive in to the rest:
Interviewer: Taking into account the current renascent politics of American nativism and the general anti-Latino atmosphere most exemplified by Arizona's and Alabama's draconian anti-immigrant-laws and the intentional or unintentional exclusion of Latino/as from all other aspects of the broader culture, literature included (take for example the long overdue recognition of Latino/a poets in Eduardo C. Corral's recent winning of the YaleSeries of Younger Poets Award and a Whiting Writers' Award) what is the role of a Latino/a writer in our times?
RG: I prefer to identify as a gay Chicano. I also embrace other terms, like queer and Latino. I think it's important to celebrate all of this language as an antidote to the hostility, derision and fear that others are attaching to them. A writer is an activist and a citizen, and has a responsibility beyond the poem, story or novel to participate in the political arena. For some of us that means picketing and organizing protests, others take to the pen or the computer and articulate positions through essays and editorials, and some perform that activism through the classroom as teachers. Activism is defined by the individual. I understand not everyone is willing to accept the challenge, but I sure as hell know that everyone can. In any case, this is an old argument and usually the only ones who speak up are the ones who want to negate that premise for selfish reasons. At the very least, people who do not want to participate in these conversations should please cease from making such comments as "I don't want to be known as a Chicano writer" or "I don't want to be known as a gay writer." We need role models, not cowards.








Published on January 27, 2012 06:57
No comments have been added yet.