a dollop unsolicited information of a lexicographic nature
Saw a thing on FB and decided not to engage because it wasn't from anyone I knew and no one was begging for my input. Instead I'll inflict the information on my readers here--who also didn't ask for it, heh.
The FB post was about a news story yesterday that "Merriam-Webster has declared 'irregardless' a word!!" The news story was full of pearl-clutching and oaths sworn to continue to teach children not to use that word, no matter what MW says, and the commenters on the FB post were shaking their ...
The FB post was about a news story yesterday that "Merriam-Webster has declared 'irregardless' a word!!" The news story was full of pearl-clutching and oaths sworn to continue to teach children not to use that word, no matter what MW says, and the commenters on the FB post were shaking their ...
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
CarolineFromConcord
(new)
Jul 10, 2020 05:24AM
The one that gets me is "disinterested" used to mean "uninterested." I don't have the latest edition, but I know I'd be miserable if that got approved -- and I'd clutch my pearls, too, except who wears jewelry under lockdown?
reply
|
flag
Who does, indeed!And I hate to tell you this, but it *is* a listed definition of "disinterested," though as an editor, I always correct it--because editors ARE prescriptive!
(Here, for reference, is the MW online definition of "disinterested": 1 a : not having the mind or feelings engaged : not interested b : no longer interested 2 : free from selfish motive or interest : unbiased.
