WHAT’S NEXT

Last week, the University of Pennsylvania announced plans to remove its statue of George Whitefield, a famous eighteenth-century British preacher, due to his condoning slavery. What was the statue, made by R. Tait McKenzie in 1919, doing at Penn? Whitefield was a lifelong friend of Benjamin Franklin, the founder of the university. Moreover, as the Penn website notes: “Franklin chose the Whitefield meeting house, with its Charity School, to be purchased as the site of the newly formed Academy of Philadelphia which opened in 1751, followed in 1755 with the College of Philadelphia, both the predecessors of the University of Pennsylvania.” Apparently Franklin, who published several of the preacher’s texts, was more tolerant than his successors. But the mob has its own reasons, or in this case putative reasons, for Penn’s action appears to have been preventative. Whitefield had to go. But what’s next? Architecture often assumes a commemorative function, must it, too, be cancelled in this misbegotten attempt to rewrite history? If Jefferson and Washington are suspect, what about their homes, Monticello and Mount Vernon. To make matters worse, the houses were built with slave labor. The architecture of both was influenced by the prevailing eighteenth-century fashion for Classicism, a style that originated in ancient Rome and Greece. Both were slave-owning societies, so no doubt temple pediments and Ionic columns will sooner or later be called into question, too.

 •  1 comment  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on July 04, 2020 05:04
Comments Showing 1-1 of 1 (1 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Pat (new)

Pat Think about what you are saying. Is it a 'Misbegotten attempt to rewrite history' to remove a large imposing statue of someone of questionable character and little truly historic character.
Are we condemned for eternity to suffer their menacing presence because someone had enough money and influence to erect a monument to them long ago.
A statue of an actual person at an institution of learning is presumably there to be admired and perhaps emulated. I doubt that most of the current student population would have gained admittance to that same university at the time that statue was put in place. Its time has passed. Some statues no longer earn their place of prominence in the lives of our young people or our shared future, so they should go.
Buildings and museum pieces play a different role as physical links to understanding of a particular time and place. 'The Strength of These Arms' is a book that talks about the role of slave craftsmanship and planning that built much of these historic homes and estates including Mount Vernon and Monticello. They do not carry only the story of the single famous 'slave masters'. Monticello also carries the broader story of the historic time and the people who crafted its beauty. Visitors can share the grief of the slaves who worked that land while also admiring the structures that their minds and hands helped create. Some extra effort would have to be made to strengthen that story, but we know by now that Presidents,while historical figures, all carry their own flaws and the burden of their time and place in history.
A statue is a singular object, more or less easily relocated, and does not have to be suffered to endure for eternity in one location while the whole world changes around it. We are allowed to decide how best to honour our past while also making room for a brighter future.


back to top

Witold Rybczynski's Blog

Witold Rybczynski
Witold Rybczynski isn't a Goodreads Author (yet), but they do have a blog, so here are some recent posts imported from their feed.
Follow Witold Rybczynski's blog with rss.