Want To Protect Yourself In The Jungle? Carry A Gun.
Yesterday I got my Shooting Times which contained the single, dumbest ad for a gun that I have ever seen in that magazine which I have been reading now for more than forty years. The ad promotes a new self-defense pistol made by Springfield Armory, a 9mm thing called the Hellcat. The pic is above.
The text of the ad begins with: “It’s a jungle out there.” Now take a look at the jungle surrounding the kid who happens to be walking away from his broken-down car. That’s some jungle. It looks much more like a road running through Nebraska or North Dakota. But of course, the kid better keep that little pistol in his pocket because you never know whether a lion or tiger will jump out of the grass and eat him alive. Or maybe try to steal his car.
Incidentally, in his left hand, he’s carrying his trusty water bottle. You don’t expect him to go trekking off through the jungle without being able to keep himself hydrated, right? That would never do. It’s a jungle out there.
The jungle is so dangerous that the FBI has just reported that violent crime in 2019 has declined 3% from the previous year. In 1994, the violent crime rate was 708.94. In 2018, it was 368.9. That’s quite a jungle out there.
Leaving aside the fact that the attempt by the gun industry to talk about crime rates in totally unreal terms is both stupid and wrong, the ad actually has an even more bizarre theme; namely, the idea that a country road can be used to somehow symbolize a jungle environment.
Want to see what most Americans consider to be the ‘jungle?’ Try this one:
[image error]
Now that’s a jungle, okay? But even the gun business has now become politically correct. You can’t talk about the urban jungle the way we used to talk about the urban jungle because then you have to say or at least hint at the issue of race. And that’s a no-no except when Donald Trump stands up at a campaign rally and shouts, “Where’s my Negro?”
You
would think that if the gun business wanted to be taken seriously, they would
do an ad showing some Black guy walking down an inner-city street. But that
wouldn’t work, not only in terms of how racist the ad would be, but because in
most cities the cops don’t give concealed-carry permits to Black residents
anyway. So, what’s the point?
The
point is that this Springfield Arsenal ad is so far away from any kind of
reality that it should be used by my Gun-control Nation friends to point out
the degree to which the manufacture and sales of self-defense weapons has
nothing to do with protecting yourself at all. The messaging is about as
reality-based as the Growing Up Gotti TV show had anything to do with
how those snot-nosed kids were being raised.
On the
other hand, from the point of view of reducing gun violence, maybe the Hellcat
ad is a blessing in disguise. Because if the owners of Springfield Arsenal have
to go to such ridiculous lengths to justify the development of their products,
then maybe the entire argument about the need for self-defense is beginning to
finally become undone.
Back in
2010, the percentage of Americans favoring stricter gun control as opposed to
not changing the laws was roughly the same, with both sides running
around 45 percent. As year, for every American who thinks that we have enough
gun control, there are two Americans who believe that gun laws should be
tightened up. If this trend continues and if the blue team wins back the White
House in November, what else can the gun business do except run crazy ads
making people believe that crime is a bigger threat than COVID-19?
I’m not
going to the gun show this weekend because being around lots of older adults may
represent a serious health risk. Stay
safe everyone!
