date
newest »


Covers are done a very long time after completion of the writing - so they can't influence it at all. In many cases the artist is reading and taking descriptions fromt the book so the "inspriation" goes in the other direction.
Author's "opinions" or "likes vs dislikes" is not a consideration in cover design. It is a "marketing decision" based on what they think will sell.
In general I think Orbit has done some of the best covers in the industry so I trust their choices.
Personally...I don't like characters on the cover in any form (unless they are enough in shadow that you can't tell much. The issue is I want people to come up with their own ideas of what the people look like. That being said...if people have to be on the cover I prefer illustrated characters rather than photographic (personal preference). But it has to be done in a good style. I think the covers that Pyr did for Jon Sprunk's Shadow's Son is very well done. But I really don't like the illustrations on the WoT covers...especially the first book that came out from Sanderson. Though recently I'm seeing they are being redone and on those the illustrations are (imho) much better.
Looking at the "set" I have often wondered how authors feel about using a photographic style representation of major character as cover artwork. Is the "person" picked prior to writing thus providing opportunity to weave features of that person into the character descriptions or am I over thinking this aspect of the project?