date
newest »

message 1:
by
G.G.
(new)
Dec 31, 2019 02:47AM

reply
|
flag


He actually explains it on paragraph 18 :
When I say the government needs to raise more money, some people ask why Melinda and I don’t voluntarily pay more in taxes than the law requires. The answer is that simply leaving it up to people to give more than the government asks for is not a scalable solution. People pay taxes as an obligation of law and citizenship, not out of charity. Additional voluntary giving will never raise enough money for everything the government needs to do. If Melinda and I signed over our foundation’s entire endowment to the state of California, it wouldn’t be enough to fund their public schools for even one year. A vibrant economic system depends on setting expectations for who pays how much.


It is fair to distribute tax collection, and I love the ways Bill suggests to do that more equitably. In terms of "writing a check," it would make far more sense for Bill and others to directly support causes they believe in, as Bill and many of us already do. A lot of our taxes go toward killing people and making weapons. I for one would not want to contribute any extra for expenditures like that. I bet Bill feels similarly.



Agreed!

Cooperation and Consideration could help. Re the Amish and societies that still barter and bake😅
Most of our thoughts are still in "little boxes made of ticky tacky"
(confession, mine was too and I am still struggling. Currencies are the normal exchange. So ... explain: how and why does a baby get born and grow up?)
TAXES?
