If Karelis fails to explain the persistence of poverty, what does? Let’s return to his six competing theories: (1) apathy, (2) fragmentation of the self (which economists might call “hyperbolic preferences”), (3) akrasia (self-control problems), (4) restricted opportunity, (5) unusual preferences, and (6) perverse policies. How do they really hold up?
(1) apathy. I don’t see this as a conceptually independent explanation. Outright apathy is a special case of either (a) hyperbolic prefere...
Published on August 15, 2019 06:40