Mike The Gun Guy Goes On Trial.
On Friday, July 19, I am going to be a defendant on trial in Las Vegas; I can only hope I will be found innocent of all charges and allowed to go free. The main charge against me is that I am against the 2nd Amendment, and the prosecutor is none other than the ‘hated’ John Lott. There will be a judge, there will be a jury and I suspect that when the trial comes to an end, I’ll be found guilty as charged.
The event is actually taking place at the Paris Hotel
and Casino, and it is a featured presentation of this year’s FreedomFest,
billed as a conference where “free minds meet to
celebrate ‘great books, great ideas and great thinkers’ in an open-minded
environment.” If you haven’t figured it out yet, FreedomFest is the
libertarian equivalent of TED or Aspen, a place where folks can learn
about one important issue or another while really getting together to cut a deal.
This isn’t the first time I’ve shot my mouth off before a pro-gun group, nor is it the first time I’ve had a public debate with the ‘hated’ John Lott. Increasingly, I go out of my way and will even endure a crummy, five-hour plane ride if I get a chance to say what I have to say before a group which fervently believes in 2nd-Amendment ‘rights.’ After all, why would I want to fly out to Seattle to appear before a meeting of Grandmothers Against Guns? I love how some of my friends who do public health research on gun violence will only speak in front of gun-control groups. What’s the point of that?
There are also some folks in Gun-control Nation who are so childishly screwed up that they attack me for being a renegade, a turncoat, a troublemaker and a not-so-secret NRA partisan by appearing on the same stage as the ‘hated’ John Lott. After all, as a good friend who happens to be a leading public health scholar once lectured me, “You’re just giving him credibility which he doesn’t deserve.”
I am not only pleased to be invited to talk at FreedomFest,
I’m hoping that my appearance will lead to more speaking invitations from
like-minded groups. And if those appearances involve sharing the stage with
John Lott, just as well. When John appears before a meeting of the Federalist
Society or some other politically-conservative group, he’s not converting a
single person in the audience to his point of view. On the other hand, when I talk
at a get-together sponsored by the NRA (and since I’m an Endowment
Patriot Life member they can’t kick me out no matter what) someone always comes
up, thanks me for coming and says, “Gee, that’s the first time I’ve heard
what you had to say.”
To my friends in Gun-control Nation, we’re not going to
challenge America’s gun culture by talking to the folks on our own side. We’re
not going to convince the majority of Americans who currently believe that a
gun protects them from crime, by telling them about some public health study
which shows the idea to be untrue. The last time that Gallup asked whether a gun made a home more or less safe, the ‘more’ outnumbered the ‘less’
by two to one, and 79% of gun owners told Pew that having a gun makes them feel safer than not.
I happen to disagree with these views. I have watched
more than 7,000 people run through a live-fire drill on my range and even with
some practice now and again, hardly any of these folks would ever
be able to protect themselves with a gun. When I talk to a gun-rights group and
tell them to find other ways to deal with the fears which drive them to buy and
own guns, I’m telling them something they won’t hear from John Lott.
Gun-control Nation should spend a little more time
thinking about why the ‘other side’ clings to their guns and a little less time
promoting their self-righteous beliefs.
If
anyone is terribly offended by what I just said, they can have all the space
they want on my blog to reply in kind.
