413. Madonna: She Overwhelms Me, She Cuts Me to the Quick
BROWDERBOOKS
Good news: Fascinating New Yorkers, my latest work of nonfiction, has been announced as an award-winning finalist in the Biography category of the 2019 International Book Awards.

A story of the strangest friendship that ever was: a dapper young bank thief and the detective hired by the banks to apprehend him.
Reviews
"What a remarkable novel! Clifford Browder's The Eye That Never Sleeps is an exciting cat and mouse game between a detective and a bank thief that is simultaneously so much more. A lively, earthy stylist with a penchant for using just the right word, Browder captures a city pullulating with energy. I loved this book right down to its satisfying, poignant ending." -- Five-star Amazon review by Michael P. Hartnett.
"New York City in the mid nineteenth century is described in vivid detail. Both the decadent activities of the wealthy and the struggles of the common working class portray the life of the city." -- Four-star NetGalley review by Nancy Long.
"Fascinating!" -- Five-star NetGalley review by Jan Tangen.
For the full reviews of the above three reviewers, go here and scroll down.
"Well written, flowing with a feeling for the time and the characters." -- Reader review by Bernt Nesje.
This is the fourth title in my Metropolis series of historical novels set in nineteenth-century New York. Three more, and then the big one; stick around.
My nonfiction work Fascinating New Yorkers has been reviewed by The US Review of Books. Reviewer Gabriella Tutino says, "There's something for everyone here in this collection of profiles, and it serves as a source of inspiration for readers who love NYC." For the whole review, click on US Review.
For more about my other books, go here.
MADONNA
SHE OVERWHELMS ME, SHE CUTS ME TO THE QUICK

She’s wild, she’s crazy, she’s noisy, she’s over-the-top. She’s Catholic and sacrilegious, self-obsessed and sexy, Carmen Miranda minus the bananas, the queen of too-muchness, the witch of grotesque. Also, at times, a frenzied super slut, a mindless singing G-string, a nun turned gymnast with gobs of stripper and a jot of clown. Boldly lipsticked with long blond hair, she prances and dances, she pulsates, she leaps. Not bad, for a 61-year-old with six children, four of them adopted, plus one by an ex-lover and one by an ex-husband.
Her performances are showbiz on steroids, a cross between a cathedral and a circus, a light show and a Mass. They engulf you like a cosmic explosion, a fireball of energy that will singe your eyeballs, scorch your ears, and leave you dazzled, glutted, gutted, limp as spinach, burnt out as an ash. She is, in a word, Madonna.

Here, not quite a blonde.flickr.com/photos/rwoan
She sounds inescapable, but I escaped her for decades, dismissing her as just another fad of the younger generation that would fizzle out in time. Fads – they come, they go. But this one is well-preserved, still around, still crazy. The world’s most famous female singer, she has sold more than 300 million records worldwide. A corporation, I’m told, and worth $800 million. Never fear, she’ll make a billion soon.
She was born Madonna Louise Ciccone (yes, "Madonna" is really her name) to an Italian American father with a degree in engineering, and a mother of French Canadian descent, in Bay City, Michigan, on August 16, 1958. Growing up in the suburbs of Detroit, she was raised a Catholic, and boy, does it show up in some of her performances. With the name “Madonna,” she has said, she had to become either a nun or what she is. In high school she got good grades, did cartwheels in the hallways between classes, and hiked up her skirt during class, to give the boys an eyeful. Not the behavior of a future nun.
In 1968, at age 20, she dropped out of college and came to New York with $35 in her pocket. It was the first time she’d ever flown in a plane or taken a ride in a taxi. She began working as a backup dancer for other artists, became herself a singer, wore fishnet stockings and a crucifix, recorded, and exploded into fame; the rest is history. Two husbands to date, both divorced, and a slew of lovers.

I do wonder how I could have missed her. I too am a transplanted Midwesterner who fulfilled himself in New York. And her birthday, August 16, is the date of my partner Bob’s death. But let’s not push it. She and I are oceans and eons apart. Yet at this late date my young friend Silas, a devoted fan of hers, teased up my morbid curiosity by announcing that he had just spent a small fortune to be in the front row of a concert of hers next fall. Impressed, I decided to take a glance at this irrepressible phenomenon. Some glance! It was mind-shattering, it cleaved me to the quick..
Having seen twice now, full-screen on You Tube, her Met Gala 2018 performance, I am overwhelmed. The Met Gala is an invite-only annual fund-raising event for the museum’s Costume Institute, where female celebrities parade their lavish and impossible gowns before a battery of cameras. The 2018 theme, “Heavenly Bodies: Fashion and the Catholic Imagination,” was well calculated to inspire Madonna’s Catholic-obsessed psyche to heights and depths of fervor.
The performance starts out with clanging bells in what seems like a Gothic cathedral with stained glass windows and a procession of monks in long robes and cowls. These shadowy figures, her all-male, all-gay chorus, sing Gregorian chants, with intermittent lightning flashes and pictures of the Virgin. Then, as the audience’s excitement mounts and their ovation crescendos, she appears at the top of a flight of stairs, in a long purple robe and a cowl, fiercely lipsticked, her golden hair in braids, with not a wrinkle in sight. Her voice projects resonantly the words of “Like a Prayer”:
“When you call my name
It's like a little prayer
Down on my knees
I want to take you there
In the midnight hour
I can feel your power
Just like a prayer
You know I'll take you there.”
This I love, for she is singing a love song – “I want to take you there” echoes repeatedly – but, well-garbed from the neck down, she is anything but sexy. Then she tosses the cowl back and slowly, still singing and always in a spotlight, she descends the steps. Finally, at the bottom, she tosses off the robe and reveals herself in what looks like a corset over a white gown, which, Silas observed, is still the most clothed he has ever seen her. Next, she is surrounded by four girls in white who paw her and grapple with her, as if to silence her, but this struggling woman is not to be silenced.
A second number follows, and then a third entitled “Hallelujah,” which almost has a Protestant touch, with two dark-clothed men in clerical collars walking solemnly behind her, followed by another processional chorus, against a backdrop depiction of Christ on the cross. Not since Handel’s “Hallelujah Chorus” had I heard so many resonant hallelujahs. This, too, I loved. As for the whole pseudo-religious setting, I can only say, once a Catholic, always a Catholic, no matter how far you stray from the Church. From its very start Protestantism, wary of overwrought ritualism and embellishments, and enamored of simplicity, had a good bit of asceticism. Raised a Protestant, as I was, Madonna would never have become Madonna. At least, not this Madonna.
It was hokey, it was supertheatrical, it was contrived. But so, by its very nature, is all theater. I liked it because it surprised me, it wasn’t what I had anticipated. If you want to sample it yourself, go here. But be prepared for sound.

The other performance that Silas showed me full-screen on YouTube was totally different, a kind of girlie show where she strutted and pranced and contorted herself in a far more secular setting. This didn’t get to me at all, for girlie shows are a dime a dozen, and always have been. At times she reminded me of Bette Midler strutting grotesquely on a stage in Washington Square Park following a Gay Pride parade of years ago.
Madonna, so Silas tells me, was hot stuff in the 1980s, when she first skyrocketed into fame, so shocking the Church that it threatened excommunication. Today, he says, when younger people see her as a bit passé, her pseudo-Catholic hocus is routinely shrugged off. But she did, for that generation, what performers in the past have done for theirs. A long tradition precedes her.

For novelty shows that seem to break all the rules, on Broadway there was Hair in the 1960s (I saw it, loved it), and Hellzapoppin in the late 1930s (I saw the movie, remember people being roasted over the flames of Hell). As for girlie shows, nothing in its time matched the Ziegfeld Follies of the 1920s and before, which I also saw in a Hollywood film about Flo Ziegfeld. I especially recall a soaring stage tower with a chorus of scantily clad chorus girls, climaxed at the very top by a male performer fully dressed in top hat and tails, singing genially.

here's competition. But maybe she can't sing.
Only the Great Crash of 1929, impoverishing Ziegfeld, and the impresario’s death in 1932, put an end to it.

before the Crash. Is there a link?
But girlie shows date back even further. There were the Floradora girls of a Broadway show of 1900, a sumptuously clad sextet in picture hats with frilly parasols, who entranced the males of the time. They all married millionaires and one of them, Evelyn Nesbit, a stunning beauty, was the unwitting cause of a famous murder, when her obsessively jealous husband shot her ex-lover, Stanford White, the most famous architect of the time, in the rooftop theater of the Madison Square Garden before scores of witnesses.

The first girlie show was probably the Black Crook, a splashy Broadway musical of the 1860s and 1870s with an impossible and forgettable plot. It featured bevies of chorines in flesh-colored tights, a hurricane of gauze, a grotto with nymphs and gods that rose magically out of the floor, fairies lolling on silver couches in a silver rain, angels dropping from the clouds in gilded chariots, and a cancan of 200 shapely legs kicking high, then turning to lift their skirts and show their frothy gauze-clad derrieres. What Madonna was to the 1980s, the Black Crook was to its time. It shocked, it titillated. From it came the Broadway musical and the burlesque show, both of them offering skimpily clothed, exuberant female stars.
And before that? The traveling circus, born in Putnam and Dutchess counties, New York, and adjacent western Connecticut, with clowns and elephants, and rhinoceri labeled unicorns, but no clothed or unclothed women. And before that? Great Awakenings, revival meetings with fire-and-brimstone sermons that terrified sinners into shakings and frothings at the mouth, and swoonings and cries of “hallelujah,” as they staggered up to the mourners’ bench to beseech the Lord to save them from the fiery pit.

Protestants used to do it. Spectators were powerfully wrought upon.
Americans have always wanted entertainments that were big, noisy, cosmic, and convulsive. Madonna, you’re in a long and glorious tradition. More power to you. Rage on till you creak.
Coming soon: The woman who left Donald Trump soaked in sweat, and other quirky moneyed denizens of the Plaza.
© 2019 Clifford Browder
Published on June 16, 2019 04:33
No comments have been added yet.