Most chemistry papers retracted for serious, not trivial problems





Chuttersnap at Unsplash



From the Trust Science! Files: While most of the papers were retracted for plagiarism and data manipulation, according to a recent study,





Dr. Coudert learned that 229 of the 331 papers (69%) were retracted for plagiarism and “data manipulation,” which, more often than not, is a nice way of saying “fraud.” (See chart.) Only 54 of the papers (16%) were retracted due to “honest errors.”Alex Berezow, “Chemistry Papers Are Retracted Mostly Due To Plagiarism, Data Manipulation” at American Council on Science and Health






… that’s not the whole story. Plagiarism is now easy to catch (which is why we hear about it so much). Treating data as the basis for stunning fiction can often be detected too, Berezow says. But honest error? That’s surprisingly hard to catch, for reasons he sets out.





Paper. (open access)





Trust science? No. Rather, trust but verify.





See also: Another Snippet From “Why People Don’t Trust Science Any More”





At Forbes: Four Reasons People “Fear Science”





Educating Oneself Away From Science Denial: Two True Stories





and





A study of the causes of science skepticism sails right by the most obvious cause of skepticism: Repeated untrustworthiness





Follow UD News at Twitter!


Copyright © 2019 Uncommon Descent . This Feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this material in your news aggregator, the site you are looking at is guilty of copyright infringement UNLESS EXPLICIT PERMISSION OTHERWISE HAS BEEN GIVEN. Please contact legal@uncommondescent.com so we can take legal action immediately.
Plugin by Taragana
 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on June 03, 2019 05:18
No comments have been added yet.


Michael J. Behe's Blog

Michael J. Behe
Michael J. Behe isn't a Goodreads Author (yet), but they do have a blog, so here are some recent posts imported from their feed.
Follow Michael J. Behe's blog with rss.