
ARN will be giving away a $50 VISA gift card for the best answer to this question:
In the Introduction to his Origin of Species Charles Darwin admitted, “I am well aware that scarcely a single point is discussed in this volume on which facts cannot be adduced, often apparently leading to conclusions directly opposite to those at which I have arrived.”
What directly opposite conclusions could Darwin have meant?
How could natural selection inhibit major evolutionary change from occurring on a gradual step-by-step basis?
Send your answer to arn@arn.org.
Previous questions.
See also: See March’s question here.
Follow UD News at Twitter!
Copyright © 2019
Uncommon Descent
. This Feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this material in your news aggregator, the site you are looking at is guilty of copyright infringement UNLESS EXPLICIT PERMISSION OTHERWISE HAS BEEN GIVEN. Please contact legal@uncommondescent.com so we can take legal action immediately.
Plugin by
Taragana
Published on May 12, 2019 14:12