If no one is really a Darwinist any more…

How to explain this? In his recent book The Problem of War: Darwinism, Christianity, and their Battle to Understand Human Conflict (2018), Darwinian philosopher Michael Ruse says, “Today’s professional evolutionists are committed Darwinians. They think that natural selection is the chief cause of change . . .” (p. ix)

Maybe, despite the most stellar achievements, any biologists who doubt are not “professional” evolutionists?

Follow UD News at Twitter!

See also: Astronomer Martin Rees reacts to Suzan Mazur’s Darwin Overthrown The story addresses the way Rees has been in the background of creative thinkers in biology who are grappling with what we now know. Non-Darwinian things.

Copyright © 2019 Uncommon Descent . This Feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this material in your news aggregator, the site you are looking at is guilty of copyright infringement UNLESS EXPLICIT PERMISSION OTHERWISE HAS BEEN GIVEN. Please contact legal@uncommondescent.com so we can take legal action immediately.
Plugin by Taragana