Let’s Stop Being Afraid of the Second Amendment.
I bought
my first, real gun in 1956 when I was twelve years old. At a flea market on
Route 441 somewhere in the Florida Glades. Now Route 441 is an endless
collection of strip malls, condo developments and more strip malls. Then 441
marked the western edge of the Glades.
Between
1956 and 2008, when the Supreme Court gave Constitutional protection for the
private ownership of guns, I probably bought and sold 500 handguns and long
guns. That’s ten guns a year which isn’t all that many for a certified gun nut
like me. Every one of those transactions was legal (well, most of them were
legal) and none of those transactions had any Constitutional protection at all.
Whenever
some well-meaning person who supports gun control starts off by saying that they
don’t want to infringe on 2nd-Amendment ‘rights,’ I want to cringe.
What’s so bad about infringing on all these 2nd-Amendment rights,
particularly when most of these so-called rights don’t really exist? The 2008
Heller decision does not (read: not) give gun owners the ‘right’ to walk around
with a gun. It does not (read: not) give AR-15 owners the ‘right’ to show up at
Charlottesville with an assault rifle strapped to their backs. It does not
(read: not) give gun owners the ‘right’ to wander all over the United States
with their guns. It gives gun owners one ‘right,’ which is to keep a handgun in their home. Period. That’s the
‘right.’
I want
this issue to be clearly understood not because it will make any difference to
how Gun-nut Nation talks about gun ‘rights.’ Want to know the latest Gun-nut
take on gun ‘rights?’ Check out this spiel on NRA-TV by a noted foreign policy expert about how
people in Venezuela are unable to fight back against the Maduro regime because
they don’t have any guns. The country happens to have the second-highest murder rate in the world, but no
doubt all those murders are committed with clubs and knives, not guns.
So let’s
not worry about how Gun-nut Nation promotes gun ‘rights.’ But we have an
election next year. And every Presidential candidate lining up against Sleazy
Don has announced their support of stronger gun laws. At the same time, all
these candidates are steadfast in their desire to ‘respect’ the ‘right’ of
Americans to own guns.
As far as
I’m concerned, my gun-control friends can pat themselves on the back as much as
they want for supporting Constitutional guarantees, but by getting up on the
barricades and proclaiming their fealty to the 2nd Amendment, they
are giving away the argument before it begins. And they should stop doing it –
right now!
I just
donated one hundred bucks to Moms Demand every month. I can guarantee you that
I am the only donor to Moms who also happens to be a Lifetime Benefactor member
of the NRA. Why do I swing both ways? Because I believe in an equal fight. But
what I don’t believe is that Gun-control Nation levels the playing field by
pretending that there’s no disagreement
with Gun-nut Nation when it comes to Constitutional ‘rights.’
The reason
we have a problem known as gun violence is not because all our guns aren’t
safely stored. It’s not because we don’t require a background check every time
we transfer every gun. It’s because we pretend that the 2nd
Amendment only allows us to pass ‘reasonable’ gun laws. And if anyone out there
really believes that a ‘reasonable’ gun law would prevent anyone from getting
their hands on a concealable handgun holding 15 or more rounds of military-grade
ammunition, you might as well follow Alice down the rabbit hole. Ending gun
violence means ending the demand for
guns which are used to commit gun violence, not ending the supply.
There are
still at least fifteen Presidential candidates who have yet to tell us what
they would do about gun violence. Maybe one of them will figure it out.
