Pushback against abandoning “statistical significance” in science

Remember the recent call to abandon statistical significance in science research? There’s been some pushback:
Statistical significance sets a convenient obstacle to unfounded claims. In my view, removing the obstacle (V. Amrhein et al. Nature 567, 305–307; 2019) could promote bias. Irrefutable nonsense would rule.John P. A. Ioannidis, “Retiring statistical significance would give bias a free pass” at Nature
Ioannidis is a well-known scourge of bad data. See, for example, Another Well-Earned Jab At “Nutrition Science”
A statistician argues that two separate problems Are being conflated:
By focusing on the term ‘statistical significance’, we ignore the more important issue of what constitutes sufficient evidence of a true association. Let’s have that discussion and redefine what we mean by a statistically significant finding. Valen E. Johnson, “Raise the bar rather than retire significance” at Nature
Without the restraint provided by testing, an estimation-only approach will lead to overfitting of research results, poor predictions and overconfident claims. Julia M. Haaf, Alexander Ly & Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, “Retire significance, but still test hypotheses” at Nature
Of course, as science embraces post-modernism, “irrefutable nonsense” could be the new standard. Along with ever more strenuous demands that we trust science.
Follow UD News at Twitter!
See also: Abandon statistical significance, learn to live with uncertainty, scientists demand Let’s see where this goes. Will it lead to less magic with numbers or more and bigger magic?
Copyright © 2019 Uncommon Descent . This Feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this material in your news aggregator, the site you are looking at is guilty of copyright infringement UNLESS EXPLICIT PERMISSION OTHERWISE HAS BEEN GIVEN. Please contact legal@uncommondescent.com so we can take legal action immediately.
Plugin by Taragana
Michael J. Behe's Blog
- Michael J. Behe's profile
- 219 followers
