Copy editing and historical happenings

A quick escape from the copy-edited manuscript morass to say Hi. Copy editing is absolutely essential and I have great admiration for those who undertake this challenging task. It takes a laser-like concentration, a good memory, and a high tolerance for boredom since the copy editor does not get to read for the plot or the characters; they have to focus on details, not the big picture. Having said that, there has never been a writer who enjoyed the experience either. Even with a good copy editor, it can be stressful; with a bad one, it can be sheer torture. I am very lucky, for I’ve only had two really bad copy editors in my long career, one who was intent upon rewriting the book for me—not in his job description—and one who was—to put it politely—very anal-retentive. To give you an idea of the flavor of his work, I had written that Richard closed his eyes. He queried, “First establish that his eyes are open?” Unfortunately, this was Sunne, my first book, and therefore my first copy-editing experience, so I suffered in silence for much too long, assuming this sort of insanity was the norm.
Happily, the copy editing for The Land Beyond the Sea really does fall into the normal range. It is still time-consuming, though, and naturally I had to deal with computer sabotage. I was horrified to discover this weekend that Mischief, my current laptop, had deleted all of my responses to CE queries after the fifth chapter. I learned long ago never to waste time trying to figure out why computers do things, but this does seem a bit extreme, no? Anyway, before I disappear again to into the editing swamp, here is a Today in History post for everyone, very late, of course.
On February 1st, 1327, Edward III was crowned King of England; he was only 14 and the government remained in the hands of his mother, Queen Isabella, and her lover, Roger Mortimer. Jumping forward a few centuries, on February 1st, 1587, a conflicted Elizabeth I finally signed the death warrant for her cousin, Mary, Queen of Scots. And on a much happier, albeit non-medieval, occasion, Abraham Lincoln signed the Thirteenth Amendment on February 1st, 1865 after it had been approved by the House and the Senate, and then sent it to the states for ratification. It would eventually be ratified by the requisite number of states in December of 1865. The Thirteenth Amendment abolished slavery in the United States, completing what had begun with Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation in 1863. My British readers can be proud that your parliament abolished slavery thirty years earlier than your cousins in the colonies.
11 likes ·   •  4 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on February 19, 2019 10:34
Comments Showing 1-4 of 4 (4 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Dorothy (new)

Dorothy I love my work editors but there are a few that I would banish back to the dark ages if I could. So, your post was timely as today one kept writing 'formatting, check this' 'formatting, make this consistent' while ignoring typos and obviously reference errors. And I sat here muttering 'editor, do your own darned job'...

I wonder if your Sunne copy editor assumed that Richard walked around with his eyes closed all the time? :D


message 2: by Sharon (new)

Sharon The odd thing about that, Dorothy, is that the Sunne copy editor had worked for my editor before and had always done a good job. When I finally approached her about his over-the-top responses, she was truly shocked. You have my sympathies with your own copy editors never fun, is it? Do you write historical fiction, too? We'd love to hear more about your writing. Goodreads is a great place to find new writers, something we're all interested in, being avid readers, too.


message 3: by Stephenie (new)

Stephenie Hi Sharon, this posting truly resonates with me because I am currently reading Mary Queen of Scots and to know that her death warrant was actually penned down on 1st February some 400 years ago ignites my imagination in going back to that era and just picturing how it all took place. That is very liberating.
On your point on copy editors, well I am not a writer yet but after reading your definition of a copy editor, my immediate supervisor is a copy editor who thinks that readers out there must be told in specific details and does not allow any room for imagination. I guess the nature of the organisation I work in is such; a university. I used to write a lot of articles for the university because I love to write. But I am beginning to realise that writing under a sometimes unreasonable supervisor a.k.a copy editor is not my cup of tea. Thanks for sharing. Now I know what to expect when I start my adventure in writing.


message 4: by Sharon (new)

Sharon So much depends upon the copy editor, Stephanie. As I said, I had two who were just awful, one who had gone off the rails for some reason and one who was trying to rewrite my book for me. With my other 13 books, it varied. In my case, it helped that my editor had considerable clout and always used it on behalf of her writers. It is possible that if I'd been a new writer without a track record, my complaints might have been brushed aside. Hard to say. In your case, I understand your wariness, for it does not sound as if you and your superior have the same approach to writing and it could be hard to find common meeting ground if she is so dismissive of imagination, which is really one of the cornerstones of fiction. Are you interested in writing fiction, too? Getting back to Mary, have you read Margaret George's novel about this unhappy queen? I confess I have always been on Team Elizabeth, not Team Mary, but Margaret is a wonderful writer and she does a superb job of bringing Mary and her world to life for readers.


back to top

Sharon Kay Penman's Blog

Sharon Kay Penman
Sharon Kay Penman isn't a Goodreads Author (yet), but they do have a blog, so here are some recent posts imported from their feed.
Follow Sharon Kay Penman's blog with rss.