Sharon TateFair Use 17 USC 1701Never Rely Upon the Word o...

Sharon Tate Sharon Tate
Fair Use 17 USC 1701
Never Rely Upon the Word of a Convicted Murderer

An excerpt from the book  Sharon Tate Campaign Plan MMXX
© 2018 Michael A. Walker

"This case easily puts Mr. John Q. Public into a position of thinking he can only rely upon the word of a convicted murderer to know what happened and who did what. There is a solution in situations where the basis has to be something other than the only living eyewitnesses and this is the situation in this case. After much thought, the only sound basis would be the physical evidence. This seems to be difficult to comprehend or accept by most people because they are romantically inclined. That is to say, they have come to over-rely on human relations to the exclusion of all else. Also, we cannot expect the murderers to recall the eye color of the people that they murdered one by one even though they looked into the eyes of these people. The most we could hope for would be that the murderers noticed perhaps light or dark colored eyes in this example of perception processing variance. What is left from the entire process can still never become a basis. There are several examples of this over-reliance on romantic inclinations worth noting in this case. In one instance, the police insisted that it had to be someone that knew the victims at the crime scene. In another later instance, the criminals were not so bad anymore and should be released because they mellowed out. In both of these examples, romanticism got to the point that it clouded judgment. Romantic inclination is where nearly everyone goes awry. People get sucked into this case on account of its frequent romanticizing. To be clear, the overriding problem with that prevailing attitude is that the only possible eyewitnesses for reconstructing how the murders in this case occurred were the convicts themselves because everyone else other than the murderers died at the scene of the crime. There remains only one way of acquiring a valid basis."
 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on November 23, 2018 00:06
No comments have been added yet.