The pap smears biggest problem

In the past, I've written about my distrust of flowery, ostentatious names, as well as any name that attempts to make something sound more cosmopolitan or international than it actually is.

Previous targets have included Chilean sea bass (Patagonian tooth fish), haricot verts (green beans), sweet meats (organs), field greens and crudités (uncooked vegetables).   

I also do not approve of naming choices that make foods sound less palatable than they really are.  Examples of this include pulled pork, head cheese and spotted dick (a pudding popular in the UK).

Names are important.  They should be accurate, descriptive, opaque and appealing whenever possible.      

Into the pantheon of naming missteps I would like to invite the pap smear.

I realize that the pap smear is considerably less optional than pulled pork or head cheese and therefore less in need of a consumer-friendly name. 

I also realize that the name is technically more accurate and descriptive than Chilean sea bass and sweet meats. 

Still, it's a bad name.

It's an awful name. 

There must be something better.  Something still descriptive in process but slightly more appealing than pap smear.

It would seem to me that almost any combination of words would be better than pap smear. 

Right?

 •  1 comment  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on November 14, 2011 03:30
Comments Showing 1-1 of 1 (1 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Erica (new)

Erica Is this accurate and opaque enough?
Papanicolaou Stain of Cervical Cells to Determine Detrimental Effects of Chronic Human Papilloma Virus Infection
On further consideration, I feel that Dr Papanicolaou also wouldn't be too happy with the unappealing contaction "pap smear" as his great legacy to the world.
Maybe we could rename it the Live-Long-and-Prosper Test.


back to top