only in the face of a "was it you", says butler

Nietzsche did well to understand that I begin my story of myself only in the face of a ÿou" who asks me to give an account. Only in the face of such a query of attribution from an other—"Was it you?"—do any of us start to narrate ourselves, or find that, for urgent reasons, we must become self-narrating beings. Of course, it is always possible to remain silent in the face of such a question, where the silence articulates a resistence to the question: "you have no right to ask such a question," or "I will not dignify this allegation with a response,…

Silence in these instances either calls into question the legitimacy of the authority invoked by the question and the questioner or attempts to circumscribe a domain of autonomy that cannot or should not be intruded upon by the questioner. The refusal to narrate remains a relation to narrative and to the scene of address. As a narrative withheld, it either refuses the relation that the inquirer presupposes or changes that relation so that the one queried refuses the one who queries.







[...]




I exist in an important sense for you, and by virtue of you. If I have lost the conditions of address, if I have no "you" to address, then I have lost "myself." In her view, one can tell an autobiography only to an other, and one can reference an "I" only in relation to a "you": without the "you", my own story becomes impossible. 

Giving an account of oneself ,  de Judith Butler