A 1983 Army War College study found 1/4 of Army brigadier generals shouldn't be

My
intrepid book researcher, J. Dana Stuster, helped me unearth a 1983 study done
at the Army War College by Lt. Col. Tilden Reid. I'd heard about this study,
and seen it cited once in Parameters
by Lt. Gen. Walter Ulmer, but had actually never been able to find a copy. (If
you find it online, please send me a link -- along with an application to be my
next researcher.)

It's
pretty strong stuff. Reid looked at the Army's new class of 25 new brigadier
generals, most of them from the infantry and artillery branches, and asked the
110 battalion commanders who had served under them to assess them.
Consistently, about one-third were rated by name as incompetent, not caring
about their people, not developing subordinates, and more managers than
leaders. Most significantly, about one-third of the battalion commanders said
they would not want to serve under that general again or be led by him in
combat. About a quarter of the new BGs should not have been promoted to that
rank, Reid bravely concludes.

The
voluntary comments at the end are especially striking. Clearly, the top third
of the new generals were real leaders. "COL ---- was the type of commander I
would want my son to serve under." "In the field, he knew his stuff better than
anyone and he reacted to changing situations with the confidence of Rommel." "I
would go to combat under his leadership anytime."

But
the bottom third are scary, especially considering this was not a survey
looking at all brigade commanders, but only that fraction promoted to
brigadier. "COL ---- said he would teach us the secrets of success that he
learned. They were deceit, misguided loyalty, finely-tuned demonstrations for
VIPs, and concentration on everything but training." "How an officer could be
selected for BG who did not know the names of his captains is beyond me." "He
lied all the time. Not once in nearly two years did I feel sure of what he was
really saying." "Several times I risked my own self-interest for what I knew
was the ethical thing to do. Other times I succumbed to his pressure and I hate
him for that." "He is pinning on stars but he lost his honor." This is the
cream of the crop?       

Reid's
bottom line: "The Army cannot afford a 25-30% error rate in selecting its
General Officers."

I
wonder what a survey today would find. Better, I think. Anybody at the Army War
College looking to demonstrate they care more about the Army than they do about
their own career?