Visual Impact.
It is a simple question, do we see with our eyes or with our brain? Of course the images at first are flashed through our eyes and then encountered by the mind but they need interpretation and recognition for an understanding of what has been seen.
In fact a major part of the survival of different species has relied on deceiving the onlooker by manipulating what they think they see, this is done through the art of subtle camouflage. From merging into the background to outright mimicking the look of a predator, survival is the name of the game and perception is a key element of it.
When it comes to entertainment, can you believe your eyes? It is with clever close up dexterity that a magician materialises objects and just as easily makes them vanish. Then there are elephants, helicopters, planes and The Statue of Liberty, all can and have been made to seem as if they have disappeared and reappeared in front of the onlooker.
There are no end of optical illusions that can bewilder, such as impossible representations of stairs that can either be made to look as if someone is ascending or descending according to the viewer’s perception of it or triangles that blow the mind in trying to comprehend there actual reality.
There are more serious aspects to understanding mental states of thought processes and the linked, associated interpretations of them. How different abstract patterns are perceived can help the sociological understanding of a person’s frame of mind.
Peoples’ mental and physical states can also greatly affect the images that can be seen. In certain circumstances such as being in a vast dessert, an intense heat or a shortage of water could cause an extreme desire to quench a thirst. That person can easily envisage a green fertile oasis. That would appear a reality until the disappointment of grasping a handful of nothing but hot sand.
Many people at the same time can report all kinds of visual phenomenon. How would one classify strange visual sightings? Individual or far between claims, one might think would enhance the obscurity of the perceived object. However experiences of unidentified and unexplained visual encounters have for some areas become a prominent event. It is not as unusual as one might expect to observe a mysterious light. There have been multiple witnesses who have noted a light in the sky above them that for no obvious reason seams to be interested in the observer and track their direction, corroborated experiences even noticing how the light became stationery before abruptly vanishing. The encounters of what might seem odd experiences with unexplained events can all be a matter of interpretation and definite identification.
If a particular idea is perceived, how easily would the mind then accept or refute what the eye sees? Sometimes it is not what you see but the atmosphere that can be created by anticipation of expectation that transforms what could be normal sounds, temperature and smells into the right settings for unusual unexplained sightings. This is the bases of some successful TV shows.
How many times have eyewitnesses in all sincerity proved to be deceived and misguided in their conclusion of what they really saw? If put to the test, many individuals’ notions of what they thought they saw does not correspond with what was accurate at the time. This proves that the susceptibility that one has to a foredrawn conclusion can rely heavily upon how influenced each of their sensory perceptions has been.
Is seeing believing? Of course it is, the only point to bear in mind is what you see may not be in reality what you think it has been. Perception is a highly influential and integral part of homing in our sight and interpretation of it.
In fact a major part of the survival of different species has relied on deceiving the onlooker by manipulating what they think they see, this is done through the art of subtle camouflage. From merging into the background to outright mimicking the look of a predator, survival is the name of the game and perception is a key element of it.
When it comes to entertainment, can you believe your eyes? It is with clever close up dexterity that a magician materialises objects and just as easily makes them vanish. Then there are elephants, helicopters, planes and The Statue of Liberty, all can and have been made to seem as if they have disappeared and reappeared in front of the onlooker.
There are no end of optical illusions that can bewilder, such as impossible representations of stairs that can either be made to look as if someone is ascending or descending according to the viewer’s perception of it or triangles that blow the mind in trying to comprehend there actual reality.
There are more serious aspects to understanding mental states of thought processes and the linked, associated interpretations of them. How different abstract patterns are perceived can help the sociological understanding of a person’s frame of mind.
Peoples’ mental and physical states can also greatly affect the images that can be seen. In certain circumstances such as being in a vast dessert, an intense heat or a shortage of water could cause an extreme desire to quench a thirst. That person can easily envisage a green fertile oasis. That would appear a reality until the disappointment of grasping a handful of nothing but hot sand.
Many people at the same time can report all kinds of visual phenomenon. How would one classify strange visual sightings? Individual or far between claims, one might think would enhance the obscurity of the perceived object. However experiences of unidentified and unexplained visual encounters have for some areas become a prominent event. It is not as unusual as one might expect to observe a mysterious light. There have been multiple witnesses who have noted a light in the sky above them that for no obvious reason seams to be interested in the observer and track their direction, corroborated experiences even noticing how the light became stationery before abruptly vanishing. The encounters of what might seem odd experiences with unexplained events can all be a matter of interpretation and definite identification.
If a particular idea is perceived, how easily would the mind then accept or refute what the eye sees? Sometimes it is not what you see but the atmosphere that can be created by anticipation of expectation that transforms what could be normal sounds, temperature and smells into the right settings for unusual unexplained sightings. This is the bases of some successful TV shows.
How many times have eyewitnesses in all sincerity proved to be deceived and misguided in their conclusion of what they really saw? If put to the test, many individuals’ notions of what they thought they saw does not correspond with what was accurate at the time. This proves that the susceptibility that one has to a foredrawn conclusion can rely heavily upon how influenced each of their sensory perceptions has been.
Is seeing believing? Of course it is, the only point to bear in mind is what you see may not be in reality what you think it has been. Perception is a highly influential and integral part of homing in our sight and interpretation of it.
No comments have been added yet.
