I Should Explain...
"Lost" and "Over There" aren't happening at the exact same time, and I'm going to explain it now (as best and as not confusing as I can...) because it's on my mind:
- "Lost" picks up immediately where "Taken" left off.
"Over There" begins about three weeks after the end of "Taken."
Why did I do it that way? That's where my impulse led me. And again, they're literally two separate books so it's fine. I didn't want to be jumping back and forth between POV's.
Well, we're about a month and a half away from release. I have to admit, the more people read "Taken," the more anxious I get about "Lost." But it's the story I want to tell. I love that you guys love "Taken." And I do hope you love "Lost," but I want it to be the way I want the story to go and not what you expect necessarily.
So anyway read "Lost" first and then "Over There" or vice versa, if you're feeling screwy.
- "Lost" picks up immediately where "Taken" left off.
"Over There" begins about three weeks after the end of "Taken."
Why did I do it that way? That's where my impulse led me. And again, they're literally two separate books so it's fine. I didn't want to be jumping back and forth between POV's.
Well, we're about a month and a half away from release. I have to admit, the more people read "Taken," the more anxious I get about "Lost." But it's the story I want to tell. I love that you guys love "Taken." And I do hope you love "Lost," but I want it to be the way I want the story to go and not what you expect necessarily.
So anyway read "Lost" first and then "Over There" or vice versa, if you're feeling screwy.
No comments have been added yet.
