If You Ain’t Got That Zing

There are a lot of TV shows I try and just sort of drift away from, because they aren’t doing enough to hold my attention. The latest in this series is Black Lightning, which surprised me, because there are a number of things I like about its characters and its story. But in the end, its dialogue doesn’t have much of a particular element for which I can find no better term than “zing.”


Thanks, brain. “Zing.” That’s a real helpful way of describing it. >_<


Zing is not the same thing as witty banter — though many shows have mistaken the one for the other, and fill their scripts with dialogue that’s absolutely leaden in its attempt to be light. You can have zing in a deadly serious conversation (as Game of Thrones has proved). It’s a cousin, I think, of Mark Twain’s comment about the difference between the right word and the almost-right word being the difference between lightning and a lightning bug: it’s the lightning lines, the ones that leap off the page or the screen, the ones that don’t just get you from Narrative Point A to Narrative Point B but make the journey between them memorable. You see it in The Lion in Winter, which along with Twelve Angry Men made me wonder if this is a quality especially possessed by older stage plays — I haven’t seen enough older stage plays to be sure. At its apex, it’s the feeling that no line has been wasted or allowed to do the bare minimum of work. Think of The Princess Bride, and how many lines from that movie are quotable. It isn’t just because the lines themselves are good; it’s because there’s almost no flab in the script, every word simultaneously developing character and furthering the plot while also being entertaining.


Zing gets my attention, in a TV show or a movie or a book. Without it, my attention wanders a bit; I scrape a general sense of the story out of the mass of words used to tell it, but don’t engage on a moment-to-moment level. With it, I lose track of the world around me because I don’t want to miss anything in the tale. Zing makes me decide, before I’m two scenes into the first episode of a show, that I’ll give the second one a shot. Zing is what makes me plow through thousands of pages of Neal Stephenson making an utter hash of his plot, because he can describe a room in above a tavern on the seventeenth-century London Bridge in such riveting terms that I wind up reading it out loud twice, once to my husband and once to my sister.


I think this is what some people, when teaching the craft of writing, describe as “voice.” I’ve been known to rant about how I find that term completely unhelpful . . . but, well, here I am talking about “zing,” because my alternative is to wave my hands around in the air and make inarticulate noises. That thing. Over there. Do you see?


These days I’m reaching for it more in my own work, especially in one of the things I’m noodling around with right now. A character is hiding in a palace full of baroque decorations and complaining about the discomfort. There’s something jabbing into my back. No. There’s a carving jabbing into my back. No. There’s a gilded carving grinding into my kidney. Better. There’s a gilded figure of the South Wind imprinting itself on my left kidney. Better still.


Doing that for every sentence is exhausting. I have no idea how Stephenson keeps it up, especially while writing books that could double as foundation stones. But I suspect that, like many things in writing, after you’ve pushed at it for a while some parts of it just settle in as habit. I hope so, anyway, because I’m going to keep trying.


The post If You Ain’t Got That Zing appeared first on Swan Tower.

1 like ·   •  7 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on June 18, 2018 22:49
Comments Showing 1-7 of 7 (7 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Bob (new)

Bob The line about foundation stones - now that's a zinger!

My son keeps urging me to read Stephenson and I keep looking at the sheer bulk of his tomes and think, "no way!"

Bruce Dickinson in the Afterword to his autobiography, "What Does This Button Do?" makes an astonishingly simple yet profound point of culling draft material, regardless of how interesting and how funny, if it doesn't move the story along. His story is really about how his inquisitiveness, boundless energy and entrepreneurial instincts helped shape the person he became. There was no time set aside for family, births, graduations, etc. and no real descriptions of what goes on behind the scenes of an Iron Maiden concert. In the end, he produced an utterly fascinating work. I have a Goodreads review out there somewhere floating in the cyberverse. To be sure, his book has plenty of zing. And yes, there were several passages I couldn't resist reading aloud to my wife.


message 2: by Marie (new)

Marie Brennan I may have deliberately tried to be colorful in describing Stephenson's books. :-) And I recommend reading them in ebook -- much easier to carry around!

It can be really hard to cut material that's engaging but not contributing the overall point of the work. Honestly, that's Stephenson's flaw, for the sort of reader who doesn't like his stuff; he's very prone to going off onto side digressions. But as with anything in writing, if you do it well enough, people will let you get away with it, and there are a lot of readers (myself included) who will let him get away with that.


message 3: by Bob (new)

Bob Thanks for your thoughts. I know authors are loathe to recommend books but if I were to read one NS book, what should it be? If you recommend one I will pose same question to son and see how that shakes out. your eBook recommendation makes loads of sense.


message 4: by Marie (new)

Marie Brennan I'm deeply fond of Snow Crash, even though I recognize that from a pacing standpoint it's seriously flawed. But it also depends on what type of story you're interested in: Snow Crash is sort of near future cyberpunk dystopia with bonus Sumerian mythology and neurolinguistics, whereas the Baroque Cycle is historical fiction with only a thin layer of speculation. I quite enjoy the latter, but it's also a three-book commitment. Haven't read Seveneves or Anathem or Cryptonomicon; The Diamond Age is probably the best-constructed of his books that I have read, but I don't think it has quite the energy of the others.


message 5: by Bob (new)

Bob While I love reading, I am a slow reader (300 wpm is typical) bc I lapse into Rita Rudner mode frequently as in, "Why did you say it like that?" My background when I was a professional seems well suited to Snow CrashMilitary and Computer Science background, cryptoanalysis and leadership interests. Enjoy historical fiction and syfy and fantasy with concentration on the masters. You are in exalted company of authors I deem worthy of multiple reads.

BTW, no idea how long it has been since I heard someone speak of zing or zingers. Word from my distant past. Cheers.


message 6: by Bob (new)

Bob Marie, that was not meant to be a left-handed compliment. I really enjoy your writing and that is why I continue to purchase your work. I get picky with sloppiness and laziness on the part of writers.

Scott also recommended Snow Crash so that is what I shall bite into. He has a copy which makes matters easier. Then he and I will discuss. His assesment of Stephenson seems to mirroe your own but he relishes all the computerese and so tolerates Neal's proclivities to digress.

All the best.


message 7: by Marie (new)

Marie Brennan Bob wrote: "Marie, that was not meant to be a left-handed compliment."

Oh, no worries! I took it in the spirit intended.


back to top