date
newest »


https://twitter.com/thisblackmagic/st...



It is my understanding, both from reading author Tweets and a statement from Riptide (https://twitter.com/RiptideBooks/stat...) that Riptide is allowing authors to take the rights back to their works if they want them.

I..."
I am aware of that. That does, however, put the onus on struggling authors to potentially blacklist themselves with Riptide rather than Riptide taking initiative to do the right thing.
Furthermore, they retain rights if you co-authored with someone who's not taking that initiative, a la the Voinov-Witt-Lane fiasco:
https://twitter.com/AleksandrVoinov/s...
I want to believe they are moving forward. Doing less than bare minimum asked does not look like moving forward: it looks like being dragged -kicking and screaming- forward.


Jeanne, I've just set up this blog
https://riptideissues.blogspot.com/
using Blogger because it doesn't track IP addresses.
I've confirmed I can set it to allow anonymous comments, so I've done that. I've set up a discussion post, and if anyone feels like commenting on that instead, they can go for it.

I thought I'd post this here for reference if anyone can use the services and help this group of superstars are offering!!
https://ww..."
I read through that thread with tears... no matter what shitty stuff happens, there are SO many wonderful people in this community... this helped to reinforce that :-)

The nastiness of some people just astounds me, honestly...🙁

I agree....loudly.

Jeanne, I've just set up this blog
https://riptideissues.blo..."
Thank you for doing this. I'm sorry I had to close the anonymous venue on my blog, but the harassment was getting to be too much--and just setting comments on moderation didn't help, as I still had to read them to approve or deny, plus the follow-up berating and insults when i didn't approve the trolling. I really appreciate you taking this up, and hope people treat you more kindly than they did me.
<3,
-X

Dear Cole, I am so sorry you were treated so atrociously. You deserve so much better. I bought "From the Ashes" and I hope your books do well and that this awful situation can be put behind you eventually.

Thank you for bringing this all to light. You've shed light on some extremely disturbing practices that we as a community need to hold as unacceptable.
I have a first draft and several in-progress novels that were planned to be submitted to there upon finalizing. I am saddened but glad now to have a better idea what I was bound to face - issues I had quietly wondered about as I browsed the vast swaths of white, cishet women listed and wondered if/where I fit in there.
I wish the only time I got to hear in depth about gay, bi, and trans men of color wasn't when something horrible went down.
People are going to tell you that you're overreacting. You're not. Just because they're uncomfortable hearing it and don't want to believe it doesn't make it any less true.
Take care, and I hope your life sees some peace and quiet soon.

https://www.theguardian.com/books/201...

https://www.theguardian.com/books/201..."
Thanks for posting that. The article is very misleading though. Makes it sound like Sarah's resignation and Riptide's comments about her unacceptable behavior was entirely due to her comment about POC on bookcovers.
Either the person who wrote the article didn't really do their homework, or they had this particular topic they wanted to cover (which is fine) and didn't mind giving the inaccurate impression that Riptide's comments were entirely due to this issue (which is not fine).
Reporting fail, IMO. Given that, I wouldn't trust anything else stated in the article is completely accurate.

While I agree this reporter over-simplified some major facts re: Sarah Lyons' dismissal, I also notice that you seem hyper-targeted on anything that can be stretched to discredit complaints against catfishers and PoC who have been targeted... even in threads that are meant to support people who have already been vetted and put through more than enough.
What is your dog in this fight?

The reporter didn't simply "over-simplify" the facts, the reporter reported a fact and failed to mention it wasn't the only issue pertinent or being referred to in what occurred and in statements made.
"I also notice that you seem hyper-targeted on anything that can be stretched to discredit complaints against catfishers and PoC who have been targeted..."
If you've "noticed" that, then your imagination is working overtime, because I have done nothing of the sort. I am in complete support of the victims of SH, Sarah, and those who harassed others on their behalf. Additionally, I support their customers and their readers against such actions and behaviors.
And if you've read the threads in which I have commented, then you'd already know the answer to your question, because I have stated it clearly numerous times.

The reporter didn't simply "over-simplify" the facts, the reporter reported a fact and f..."
Point 1: agree.
Point 2: disagree.
Question remains imaginatively dodged.

Also?
That is a damningly bad article.
It cherry-picks facts to explicitly minimize the issues the journalist is writing about, contrary to what the purpose of the article seems to be. It does the topic a disservice by being reductive and rolling multiple serious issues into single-line soundbytes that make it hard to get the full picture. I don't think that was the journalist's intention, but that's what happened.
And I'm a bit pissed at having my name attached to it when the journalist never even contacted me to tell me she was writing about me, let alone to discuss facts of the situation with me. I've had several people email me upset about it only to find out I had nothing to do with it. I'm just lucky it's the US Guardian; no one reads that. If it was the UK Guardian my Twitter mentions would be full of trolls, since she essentially painted a target on my back without my consent.
The article isn't doing anyone any favors, and it's actually letting Riptide and the industry in general off the hook for what looks like minor infractions the way it's presented.
I'm not a fan of soft-pedaling.
At all.
-X

Also?
That is a damningly bad article.
It cherry-picks facts to explicitly minimize the issues the journalist is wri..."
I appreciate hearing your point of view, Cole. Thank you for posting. I'm very sorry for all you've gone through, and are going through, due to all this.

Also?
That is a damningly bad article.
It cherry-picks facts to explicitly minimize the issues the journalist is wri..."
Oof, that's not good journalism, not good journalism at all. *sigh*
I thought I'd post this here for reference if anyone can use the services and help this group of superstars are offering!!
https://www.facebook.com/permalink.ph...
The document is titled "Authors Helping Authors Sign-Up" and from the looks of it, it's a network/source of help for authors who are leaving and pulling their books from Riptide!!