3 Questions Every Creative Person Must Ask

Glacier National Park


I'm starting to find that the same dilemmas come up again and again when I talk with a group about online media and marketing.


These are dilemmas that I can't solve. They boil down to three questions you have to ask yourself—and be able to answer honestly—to find a path that's your own, not mine.


 


1. Are you creating primarily for yourself or primarily for an audience?

Almost all of my advice is based on the assumption that you want to entertain, inform, or increase your audience. Not everyone is concerned with this, nor should they be.


If you're producing work for an audience, it means:



playing by at least some rules of the industry
caring what others think of your work
interacting with your audience and being available to them
doing things not for your art, but out of service to your audience
putting on a performance, or adopting some kind of persona
marketing and being visible

If you're creating for yourself, it means:



the act is worthwhile regardless of who sees your work
fulfillment comes from your struggle with the practice, not from distribution or feedback

Of course, you may be creating for both yourself AND an audience. But some artists who believe they are producing work for an audience aren't willing to make the sacrifices required to do so. Which means there's another level to this.


Are you:



creating for an audience
creating for an audience that earns you money

Once money enters the equation, you have to start sacrificing more of what you want, and bend to the demands of the market. (Or find a generous patron or foundation!)


What is it that you truly want out of your creative endeavors? Do you really know?


 


2. How much of yourself are you going to share? And which part?

Let's assume you do want an audience (of any size). It necessitates some kind of persona. Deciding not to have a persona (removing yourself from visibility, Pynchon style) is a persona.


You can't imitate someone else's persona. You can only be yourself. Some of us think famous people are (or ought to be) aloof and distant, so we imitate aloofness, even when it has nothing to do with our personality.


After I give talks about digital marketing, relationship building, and social media, inevitably one person will come up and say, "I don't want to be visible online. I just want people to read my stories."


That's a rather boring proposition in this day and age.


So you have to ask yourself—even if you're shy or think you're boring—what part of yourself are you going to share and put on display? It's got to be something, so let's make it interesting. Let's really dive into the fiction of who you are OR aren't. Make up something you can believe in, so others can believe in it, too. (That's what we all want, most desperately. Meaning.)


 


3. What is your killer medium?

For me (personally), it's not the book form. It's the workshop or the conference keynote. It's the ability to answer any question thrown at me. It's my desire to be of service in a personalized way.


Speaking about writers specifically, the book is often assumed to be the most authoritative and important medium, but that's only because we've all been led to believe that (through a culture that has created The Myth about the author as authority).


It's a Myth, neither good nor bad. Just a belief system that, increasingly, we're all moving away from.


Creative people too often pursue mediums that have been pushed on them by other people, and because it's the well-worn path. As Robert Frost says, take the road less traveled. It makes all the difference.


 


1 like ·   •  3 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on October 14, 2011 02:00
Comments Showing 1-3 of 3 (3 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Lydia (new)

Lydia Interested in the idea that an invented online persona can deliver meaning where an author's actual identity cannot. You're right -- authors are really existing in a whole new plane of fiction these days, with the amount of "exposure" that comes via the internet. Smarter to play a meaningful character.


message 2: by Jane (new)

Jane Friedman Insightful! I didn't actually mean to suggest that a persona would be different than an identity, but I don't disagree with what you've said.

Here's more what I was thinking:
The root of the word "person" is the Latin word "persona," meaning "mask." My belief is that all of us walk around wearing some kind of mask that we've created, based on the situation/environment/moment.

We don't wear the same mask around coworkers as we do around our parents as we do around our kids, etc. Each mask emphasizes some things and leaves other things out.

It's the same concept as realizing the story you tell about your life does indeed become your life. The way in which you frame it makes all the difference. Same with your persona.

I don't think it's possible to project something that's a "true" identity because such a thing does not exist. But that doesn't mean you can't project something you believe is an authentic and a genuine window into who you are and what you're doing, at least in relation to your readership and identity as a writer.


message 3: by Lydia (new)

Lydia You're right, and I think I get what you're saying.

I have been thinking about it a lot, as an author with a book on its way out into the world next year. I've had to modify my presence online, for sure, and just really consider what I'm actually doing, how it could be or whether it even should be cohesive, etc. For example, I've been blogging about homeschooling for years -- is that something I still want to write about / expose / illustrate? With the internet, so much more is accessible and permanent. Do you have to try and carefully shape what's out there, or can you just get by being as authentic as possible, and hoping it all fits together? Questions on my mind. Heh. :)


back to top

Jane Friedman

Jane Friedman
The future of writing, publishing, and all media—as well as being human at electric speed.
Follow Jane Friedman's blog with rss.