Why the U.S. can handle minor threats like terror better than Europeans can

Jakub
Grygiel is one of the more interesting strategic thinkers around. In the
new (Fall 2011) issue of Orbis he has a good piece that looks
at why certain decentralized parts of the Roman Empire were better able to
counter the barbarian invasions than were others.

The lesson of his inquiry:

The policy of
decentralizing security provision by, for instance, building greater
capabilities for local police forces, may be the most effective way of responding
to such a security environment. Signs already abound that this is exactly what
is already happening in the United States, a country that because of a deep
tradition of self-reliance and federalism may be well positioned to adapt to
the possibility of non-state, small, localized, threats. Other countries, in
particular in Europe, where the drive to build a centralized state that
arrogates to itself most aspects of social life has been historically longer
and more relentless, may face greater challenges.