Why Is the Oxford Comma a Heated Debate in 2017?

Grammar rules change daily. We learn about them two years later. If we’re lucky. Fortunately, we can keep track of those changes by using a style book.


Sometimes we have to switch style books. An academic journal that publishes my work only accepts manuscripts in Chicago Manual of Style. I didn’t think it was a big switch until I realized the Chicago Manual disagrees with the Associated Press on comma usage. Changing habits that go that deep is difficult.


If it surprises you that style rules depend on who dictates them, and the publication that adopts them, you don’t understand the history of language. The first standardized English dictionaries weren’t compiled until the eighteenth century. It’s only been within the last 150 years that we’ve tried to standardize American grammar.


[image error]The Oxford requires a comma before the last item in a list longer than two. For instance derby, mustache, and umbrella.

In spite of what your English teacher may have told you, we never succeeded. The rules are as fluid as language and some, like the comma (especially what is known as the “Oxford comma”), are never resolved.


Grammerly recently updated readers on a number of style book updates, one of which is not the Oxford comma.


Why Is the Oxford Comma a Heated Debate in 2017?

SaveSave



 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on December 09, 2017 20:06
No comments have been added yet.


Wind Eggs

Phillip T. Stephens
“Wind Eggs” or, literally, farts, were a metaphor from Plato for ideas that seemed to have substance but that fell apart upon closer examination. Sadly, this was his entire philosophy of art and poetr ...more
Follow Phillip T. Stephens's blog with rss.