Actually, not so controversial

How many
times have we heard, and probably even asked ourselves, “What would Jesus do?”
The question has become so ubiquitous, people readily recognize simply WWJD.

When we challenge
ourselves with “WWJD,” are we raising a controversial question? Is it blasphemous
to even ask, What would Jesus think?
Is it sacrilegious to try and enter the mindset of our Lord, to reflect on what
He might say or do in certain circumstances? Hardly! Jesus dwelt among us as a
model. The Word became flesh to set an example—to walk as a living precedent on
how to interact with others and build an intimate relationship with His Father.
In fact, the Gospels offer so many stories, or “case studies” if you will, about
Christ’s words and deeds, speculating what our Lord might say or do in other situations
becomes somewhat natural. Thus, WWJD is a meaningful hypothetical that can
strengthen our faith and enhance our relationships.

But how
about reflecting on what Jesus might have spoken, thought or even silently prayed
while he was physically here, truly present as a man? Might that be too controversial? Well, since the
Gospel narratives provide numerous accounts that develop spiritual perspectives
for His actions and dialogue, we are probably not too hard-pressed to consider what
the thoughts were behind those actions, what the meditations were behind those
words. If we take it a step further, if we flesh out such wonderful
contemplations with historical backstory and relevant, realistic human
discourse, an appreciation of the mindset of Jesus during his journey among humanity
becomes less and less of a stretch. It becomes a powerful, personal adventure
through the Gospels … an adventure to literally save the world. To behold the
life, death and resurrection of Jesus through His experience can help us better
understand our Savior and what He wants for us.

Controversial?
Give In
The Flesh – My Story a read before you decide.