Why Net Neutrality Should Be Repealed
I think it's time to mention again why net neutrality should be repealed, and for that matter, the FCC should be put out of business. Both are violations of the First Amendment and its proscriptions on government regulation of media ("Congress shall make no law").
I've been making this point for a few years, already, but it never has had more relevance than in this day and age, with someone in the White House who would love carte blanche control over all media.
How much more evidence of the danger of government controlled media do we need? Trump almost daily rants about how real media such as CNN are purveyors of "fake news," which, in Trump-speak, amounts to anything he finds unwelcome. He just this week moved to prevent the merger of Time Warner and AT&T, unless Time Warner divested itself of CNN, which could well put the pioneering all-news cable network out of business, or at least hinder its operation.
The notion that if net neutrality is abolished, all of us will be prevented from reading and writing and watching what we want online is not true, anyway. Everyone was doing just fine before net neutrality was adopted by the FCC just a few years ago, under Barack Obama's urging.
But even if net neutrality were desirable, the price we would pay by weakening the First Amendment would be far too high. Our freedom of expression, and thereby our freedom, has never been under greater attack. Now is the time to get keep governmental regulation as far away as possible from our essential media lifelines. We shouldn't let the fact that Trump wants to do away with net neutrality blind us to the fact that such an action would be a good way of limiting his attempts to punish media not to his liking.
Paul Levinson's books ... Paul Levinson's music
I've been making this point for a few years, already, but it never has had more relevance than in this day and age, with someone in the White House who would love carte blanche control over all media.
How much more evidence of the danger of government controlled media do we need? Trump almost daily rants about how real media such as CNN are purveyors of "fake news," which, in Trump-speak, amounts to anything he finds unwelcome. He just this week moved to prevent the merger of Time Warner and AT&T, unless Time Warner divested itself of CNN, which could well put the pioneering all-news cable network out of business, or at least hinder its operation.
The notion that if net neutrality is abolished, all of us will be prevented from reading and writing and watching what we want online is not true, anyway. Everyone was doing just fine before net neutrality was adopted by the FCC just a few years ago, under Barack Obama's urging.
But even if net neutrality were desirable, the price we would pay by weakening the First Amendment would be far too high. Our freedom of expression, and thereby our freedom, has never been under greater attack. Now is the time to get keep governmental regulation as far away as possible from our essential media lifelines. We shouldn't let the fact that Trump wants to do away with net neutrality blind us to the fact that such an action would be a good way of limiting his attempts to punish media not to his liking.

Paul Levinson's books ... Paul Levinson's music
Published on November 24, 2017 12:41
No comments have been added yet.
Levinson at Large
At present, I'll be automatically porting over blog posts from my main blog, Paul Levinson's Infinite Regress. These consist of literate (I hope) reviews of mostly television, with some reviews of mov
At present, I'll be automatically porting over blog posts from my main blog, Paul Levinson's Infinite Regress. These consist of literate (I hope) reviews of mostly television, with some reviews of movies, books, music, and discussions of politics and world events mixed in. You'll also find links to my Light On Light Through podcast.
...more
- Paul Levinson's profile
- 342 followers
