China and the US: Comparing Leadership Selection

*

*

Exploding the myth the US uses a democratic process to choose their president.


Featured Image -- 13894


Astute News


The US selection of leaders has virtually nothing to do with democratic processes and outcomes. It is useful to contrast this with the process in China. In most instances, China’s selection of leaders is far more meritocratic, successful and performance-based. In both the US and China, the process lacks transparency.



US Economic, Political and Cultural Leadership



The selection of US economic, political and cultural leaders is based on several undemocratic procedures.



1. Inheritance via family ties

2. Personal access to credit and financing

3. Political patronage

4. Lobby and elite sale and purchase of office and favors

5. Media links

6. Political repression and manipulation of electoral procedures

7. Incumbency and use of state resources

8. Ethno-religious nepotism

9. Internal party hierarchy

10. Closed party decisions (opacity)

11. Ability to keep secrets



Leaders, whether appointed, self-appointed and selected through money, media, elite networks, turn the electoral process into virtual afterthoughts…


View original post 1,228 more words


[image error]
 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on November 13, 2017 11:16
No comments have been added yet.


The Most Revolutionary Act

Stuart Jeanne Bramhall
Uncensored updates on world affairs, economics, the environment and medicine.
Follow Stuart Jeanne Bramhall's blog with rss.