Andrew Moore Updates!

A reminder and apology to start, the first book in the Andrew Moore series, titled Warlock's Son, has been released for both purchase and KU today. Early this morning I noticed it wasn't available for KU, which was a mistake I made during publishing, and it has since been fixed and is now enrolled and available. Link Below:

https://www.amazon.com/Warlocks-Son-A...

The second book in the Andrew Moore series, titled Warlock's Mage, is now available for pre-order only. It will also be available in KU when it's released. The release date for it is Tuesday November 28th. Link Below:

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0771J3CSS

What's next? December will see the close of this three book series and the last book for 2017.

Happy Halloween!
 •  3 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on October 31, 2017 11:27 Tags: andrew-moore
Comments Showing 1-3 of 3 (3 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by John (last edited Nov 01, 2017 09:09AM) (new)

John Kratz Is there punishment for succubus for breaching the contract or it's only on warlock's side? He summoned her for negotiations that begone (in my opinion) when she appeared. Then she told him (on her own accord) that her sister let her know what's going on and told her to expect his summons - which I'm pretty sure was a lie. And little later she promised him she wont be lying during negotiations (again on her own accord) - and it wasn't anything like "I won't lie to you from now on", but whole negotiants should count. So in my opinion by doing this she was already in breach of contract where negotiations were based on a lie on her side. Which means binding magic shouldn't work at all or contract should be voided, renegotiated or even her soul should be forfeited (does she even have one?) when/if he makes himself aware of her error. Your thoughts?

I know It's small detail but whole negotiation was based on details - and those are important especially with demons. Besides this was oral agreement, so everything that was said counts.


message 2: by D.R. (new)

D.R. Rosier That wasn't part of the negotiations, that was simply small talk and had nothing to do with the actual deal they made. She lied and cheated to get him to that point, to make the deal, but not during the negotiation for the deal itself. She is a demon after all...

Think of it like a contract, I do this for that. That's the only part that needs to be true, an aside claiming the sun is blue is outside the contract and outside the deal. Demoness, so think like a slimy lawyer, just saying.

Her soul would never be forfeit, his would be freed, but he'd also lose his power if the deal was broken. It isn't completely one sided, she'd lose all the power that she would have gained and her access to Earth.

No longer lying was part of the deal though, so once the pact was sealed she can no longer lie or she'll breach the contract. I think I made that pretty clear, I'm also rather uncomfortable with the spoilers in this conversation, so if you want to continue this please send me an e-mail.


message 3: by John (last edited Nov 01, 2017 12:51PM) (new)

John Kratz Sadly I can't agree about that. If I was asked to be part of some negotiation meeting and I said while entering it something like "Hi, I'm here today on behalf of Mr A. Lets begin our negotiations.", later on I would said "I'm not lying during this meeting." and after all was said and done it would be proven that I was actually there on behalf of Mr. B and not Mr. A, I could/should be accused of contract breaching later on. Especially when in my example I could lead this conversation and not mention whom I represent as well as not mention "not lying" remark. After all whole pact was verbal (there was no written agreement, right?), so whole conversation can be seen by magic as part of contract including "not lying during negotiations" promise. Especially when later on one side thinks/believes they were tricked and when no one said earlier "Lets begin our negotiations." to separate actual contract from this "small talk". In such case I'm sure magic included in "pact" would be fair to the end. After all demon that is doing such verbal contracts for millennia should be smarter and more careful with words. ;P

But like I said it's a detail in the fictional story. Besides as you presenting "magic laws" in this world if Andrew himself regards this as "small talk" outside of actual negotiations, magic that could judge this as contract breach probably can't be triggered anyway. So actually both sides are propably faulty - she for saying too much without real need and he for not spotting/arguing her mistake. ;)

If it was me, I would propably argue to renegotiate more favorable conditions to me and punish Lilith far longer, but in the end still would stay with her. Besides it's short story, so you can't drag it.


back to top