Everybody, Just Calm the F*** Down



















This blog post, as most of my blog posts,
will cover several topics. But this time I have a theme. It's called: Let's get
a fucking grip, people! Seriously.




You all wanted a good long rant, didn't you? I haven't indulged in a while.



Okay, first we'll talk about me and my
grip-losing insanity this week. For more than a year I've been querying agents
and publishers. It began with a single manuscript and over that period has
expanded to five manuscripts. Literally hundreds of queries have been sent
between the five. I've researched each one and sent the queries only to agents
or publishers I felt would like said manuscript and rejection, rejection,
rejection was the result.




So I stopped querying. I'm pausing to catch
my breath and decide what the hell it is I want out of this writing thing. Do I
want to be published? Yes. Do I need a publisher? I think so. Do I need an
agent? I'm not sure. Why not self-publish? Because I've worked hard and I want
a publisher and I'm good enough to have a publisher and if I self-publish then
it's like I just wasted 18 months querying. Right?




I want to traditionally publish my book for
more valid reasons than that. Really, it was a very well thought out decision
that had little to do with which is better and more to do with what felt right
to me personally.




Well, I have this one manuscript, I Do…And Other Lies We Tell, and it has
become a giant pain in my ass. I'm telling you it just keeps giving me trouble.
This is the manuscript that gets personal rejections nearly every time.
Granted, it's gotten a few form rejections, but I'd say 80 percent of the
rejections for this one have been personal notes that were encouraging, but
still turning me down. From commercial fiction agents/publishers I got this "While
the writing is excellent, we feel you would be better served working with
someone that handles literary fiction. It is not commercial enough for us.
Sorry." That's it in a nutshell. One particular rejection stated that the
characterization and dialogue in my sample chapters was "stellar", but sorry,
not commercial enough. Sigh.




So I changed my focus. I don't feel it's
literary, but if the pros think it is so be it. I'll query agents/publishers
looking for literary fiction.




From literary agents/publishers I got "While
we think the writing is strong, etc. this is not literary fiction. It is too
commercial for what we represent/publish." WTF? Come on now. How can it be too
commercial and yet, too literary? This is not possible. Then I read this post by Nathan Bransford and I swear to you, I thumped my head off the table several times. I think I
lost consciousness briefly, but that's not important. Why hurt myself like that?
Because I found my brain saying, "You should totally self-publish I Do, because
it's the only way it'll be published. He's totally right. The market is
changing. You gotta change with it." I wanted to stick a fork in my eye to shut
my thoughts up. How could I, the one who is certain the path she wants to take
in her career, even entertain the idea?




Then I went to bed, got up grumpy, drank a
bucket of coffee and I got a grip. So what if I considered it? So what if self-publishing
is sort of appealing. He's right. Times, they are changing whether I like it or
not. The publishing industry is drastically different than it was just a few
years ago. It is a different game. Doesn't it make sense to reconsider your
options? I calmed down and here I am, gripped and sane.




What are your thoughts on Nathan's post and
my reaction? Should I? Is the industry so changed that anyone stands a better
chance with self-publishing?




Now, onto the rest of you who insist on
annoying me this week. Let's begin with Twitter.




The world of Twitter is remarkably small.
Oh yes, for all the billions of Tweeps there are out there, news travels at
lightning speed, and so does reputation. You can ruin yourself real fast on
Twitter.




It is a great marketing tool for writers.
But please, folks, use it properly. Tweeting about your book and only your book
is not how you market on Twitter. I'm sorry, but if you post a dozen or more
times each day a link to both your book or your blog and nothing else, I am
going to unfollow you so fast it'll make your head spin. No, I don't care if
you unfollow me back. I don't want you on my list anyway. Will I buy your book?
Hell no. The title now annoys me so much because it keeps FILLING UP MY
TIMELINE SO I CAN'T READ ANYTHING ELSE, that I never want to see it again. Get
what I'm saying here?




Twitter, when properly used, builds an
online presence, gives people an idea of who you are and what your books are
about and it doesn't annoy, harass or piss people off. In other words, post
something other than your own damn links. Retweet a tweet that made you laugh.
Post a quote or two. Say hello to a few followers you enjoy following back.
Tweet about your book and your blog or whatever it is you're selling.
Definitely do that. But don't be so aggressive you have the wrong effect on
people. Also, if you must tweet over and over again, be creative and change it
up. You're a writer for crying out loud. Surely you can find different ways of
saying "Buy my book" or "Check out my book". And don't bitch when people don't
follow you back or don't retweet your shit. That annoys me too. Just because
you put "RT" before or after the tweet doesn't make it law that I must retweet
it. Actually, just don't put "RT" at all, because my Irish instantly prevents
me from doing so. "Oh, so the wee lass is ordering us to retweet her little bit
of nonsense, eh? Well, I'm afraid that isn't going to happen. We cannot
possibly do what we're ordered to do by someone we don't know. Never."




Get a grip on how to use Twitter in such a
way that it doesn't annoy the shit out of people.




Next, pen names. Jesus, I'm already running
so long here. Let's see…okay, unless you're a children's writer who also writes
erotica or other extremely-adult fiction, why? Why would you want to use any
name but your own? Sure if your name won't fit on the damn cover, I understand.
If your name is Seymour Butts, Hugh Jass or Ben Dover, perhaps you might
consider a pen name. If you're Nora Roberts, Stephen King or some other
household name that can let it "slip" they're using a pen name to rebrand and
use this "leak" of information to let readers know the pen name indicates a
different genre than they're used to, then fine. Have at it.




If you're Joe Nobody who hasn't published a
single thing and wants to use a pen name because you're worried about getting
rich and famous and gathering so many haters/stalkers that your life would be
in danger…get a grip. It's not likely to happen anyway. Own what you write.
Honestly, this ridiculous fad (or whatever you want to call it) where we all
hide behind anonymity because we're afraid of offending this person or that or
because we'd never say these things without the protective cloak of a pen name,
makes me sick. It annoys me. Why? If you're so afraid to own something you've
written, don't publish it. If you don't have the balls to say "Yeah, I wrote
this" then you don't deserve to publish it. That's right, I went there. Get a
grip, folks. Don't assume you'll be disowned or people will come to your house
packing weapons or flaming bags of shit. Give people more credit than that.
They might surprise you.




And one brief mention for those of you who
have a problem with the Breast Cancer Awareness campaign that includes the
slogan "Save the tatas" or "I like Boobies", you all need to calm the fuck
down. Listen, every time a kid who is giggling maniacally at the words boobies
and tatas, buys a bumper sticker or a bracelet so he can go home and continue
to giggle with his buddies, money goes to breast cancer research. Every time
someone asks him what it's for, he must pause and consider that. If he doesn't,
well big deal. The thing is, it is helping a good cause. Kids are donating and
some are actually learning. My daughter came home last night saying a few
teachers believed an "I love boobies" bracelet was inappropriate for school. She's
upset because she wants to get one. She has an aunt (my aunt) who she loves
very much who is a breast cancer survivor. She was looking forward to wearing
her bracelet and telling people that while it is funny, she's wearing it
because she's glad her aunt is still here, that she won her battle. How can you
criticize that?




Get a grip. They're just words. Last I
checked, boobies was not on the offensive list. Do you all realize the more you
tell a kid not to like something, the higher his or her interest in it will be?
Laugh it off. It's a fad. The Cancer Society will benefit while it lasts and
kids get a little giggle. It's certainly better than posting some random
message on Facebook implying that you're pregnant or having sex on a table
while eating pickles, but keeping the reason you're posting such a blatant lie
a secret in an effort to spread awareness. But let's not get started on that.




Last, a very wise man (Paul Mitton) warned
that what we type online is "forever". It is. Everything that is published in
any format is essentially forever. That doesn't mean you should bite your
tongue, but you should use caution and common sense. Be aware that some things
you post/publish will anger some people. You can't please everyone and if you
think you can, well you're not going far before they strap you into a jacket
and carry you off.




I'm aware that this post could piss people
off. Do I care? Not really. That's why I'm posting it. Believe it or not, I
weighed my words. I deleted sections and rewrote them. I omitted some major
annoyances because I realized they're only annoying me this week because of
hormones and lack of sleep. Next week I won't feel the same and I'll wish I
didn't post them. So I removed those.




The rest? Well, it's how I feel. It's my
opinion. I own it. If you want to hurl shit at my door, go ahead. Just be sure
to hit the windows so that Kurt has to clean those while he's cleaning the door.
They're awfully cloudy. Oh, and run really fast. I might not like exercise, but
I'll definitely make sure shit-throwing doesn't go unanswered.









 •  2 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on September 08, 2011 16:23
Comments Showing 1-2 of 2 (2 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Rita (new)

Rita Webb I think a main reason to self-publish is to build a readerbase. Traditional publishers want authors who already have an established readerbase, but if you don't have something to offer your readers, your ability to market yourself begins to stagnate.

A good, successful self-published author can find a traditional publisher later, but it doesn't hurt to give your fans a taste of your work in the meantime.


message 2: by Renee (new)

Renee Good advice, Rita. I agree that self publishing now offers new authors a chance to prove themselves...just wish our work did that for us. Sigh.


back to top