The fatal February 10th

February 10th was the date of death of two dukes, a king, one of those treacherous Stanleys, and the worst king-consort ever. Only two of them—maybe two and a half—were worth mourning.
On February 10, 1126, William, the ninth Duke of Aquitaine, also known as the first troubadour duke, died after a long and eventful life. He had a keen sense of humor so he may have been amused that today he is mainly remembered as the grandfather of our Eleanor. But he also had a healthy ego, so maybe not. I would have grieved for him—unless I was one of his wives!
On February 10, 1134, Robert, the Duke of Normandy died after being held prisoner by his not-so-loving younger brother, Henry I, for twenty-eight years. Robert seems to have been a feckless sort, certainly no match for the ruthlessness of Brother Henry, but he probably didn’t deserve nearly three decades of captivity.
On February 10, 1163, Baldwin III, King of Jerusalem, died. He was only in his 33rd year and by all accounts was a very good king, an adroit politician, and a courageous battle commander. He also seems to have been a genuine good guy, charming, affable, and handsome. His death dramatically changed the history of the Holy Land, for he’d not yet had children with his beautiful bride, the seventeen year old Byzantine princess, Theodora, and so the crown passed to his younger brother Amalric, the Count of Jaffa. Amalric had none of Baldwin’s charisma, was taciturn and introverted. He proved to be a capable king, though, but he, too, died prematurely, leaving a thirteen year old son as his heir, the boy who would tragically become known to history as the Leper king. Had Baldwin not died so young or had Amalric lived long enough for his queen, also a Byzantine princess, to give him another son, the kingdom’s doomed march to Armageddon might not have happened. There is no doubt that Saladin is one of history’s more fascinating figures, a brilliant politician, but his great victory at Hattin was based in part upon the disunity among his Christian foes, just as the first crusaders took advantage of Saracen discord to carve out the kingdom of Outremer eighty-some years earlier. Baldwin III does not appear as a character in my new novel, being dead by the time the book opens, but Amalric makes a few appearances before dying of dysentery and his son is a major character, of course. Had I lived then, I would definitely have mourned Baldwin.
On February 10, 1495, William, Lord Stanley, was executed by Henry Tudor, accused of treason, irony at its best. Party time!
Lastly, on February 10, 1567, Henry Stuart, Lord Darnley, was messily murdered, a death that was richly deserved. One of my favorite scenes from the wonderful film, Mary, Queen of Scots, had Elizabeth (the incomparable Glenda Jackson) and Cecil practically falling on the floor laughing upon learning that Mary had been foolish enough to take the bait and marry Darnley.
16 likes ·   •  10 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on February 10, 2017 11:16
Comments Showing 1-10 of 10 (10 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Therese (new)

Therese No doubt Henry was ruthless (not to mention an opportunist), but what other choice did he have if he wanted to keep his throne, I mean regarding his brother, Robert?


message 2: by Sharon (new)

Sharon At least he did not have Robert murdered, "just" blinded. I guess he gets points for that?


message 3: by Therese (new)

Therese Okay, I forgot about him being blinded. Definitely no reason for that. Just glad I didn't live during those times.


message 4: by Sharon (new)

Sharon Me, too. I am way too fond of my creature comforts. Also, I much prefer our times when it comes to the status of women in society.


message 5: by Therese (new)

Therese I hear you loud and clear :-) Still I'm glad that I get to read about these things, not to mention share my love of history, etc. with others, especially those who write about it.


message 6: by Sharon (new)

Sharon I just wish there were more people who loved history as much as we do, Therese.


message 7: by happy (last edited Feb 10, 2017 07:55PM) (new)

happy "here, here" or is "hear, hear" :)

I've been reading history and historical fiction for almost as long as I can remember (I turn 60 this year) - I think I caught it from my mother (rest her soul) She always had a history or HF book lying around. God bless Jean Plaidy and Thomas Costain!


message 8: by Sharon (new)

Sharon My parents also encouraged my interest in history, too, Happy. Definitely getting us both off to a good start!


message 9: by Therese (new)

Therese When I was little I was interested in my dad's stamp collection, Canada, and so worked backward from Elizabeth II-Victoria. Then I wondered who was before that. It wasn't until sometime later that I started finding books about some of the Queens a.k.a. Elizabeth (my favorite as if you couldn't guess), and the more I read, the more I was intrigued and fascinated. Still your books about the Plantagenets have been the best, but I want to continue on and work my way through the British monarchy. I have one other friend who shares this interest. I don't know what anyone else thinks. I no longer care :-) I'm having too much fun.


message 10: by May (new)

May My Dad introduced me to Historical Fiction when I was twelve... a very long time ago. From then on, we read & shared our HF, often birthday and Christmas gifts. Sharon, he would have just soaked up your books!!


back to top

Sharon Kay Penman's Blog

Sharon Kay Penman
Sharon Kay Penman isn't a Goodreads Author (yet), but they do have a blog, so here are some recent posts imported from their feed.
Follow Sharon Kay Penman's blog with rss.