wssh-watson:isitandwonder:sidhamish:If you’ve ever been...

wssh-watson:

isitandwonder:

sidhamish:

If you’ve ever been called crazy or delusional for noticing gay subtext in Sherlock please remember that Mark Gatiss actually said there was gay subtext in Sherlock.  And that it was there intentionally.

Is that from buzz 2010 @sidhamish ?

So, he liked the flirting - but never actually wanted to go through with it and consumate? Why? Every narrative needs a purpose, a beginning and an end. In between, things happen, but they always lead up to something, at least in an artificial narrative. So, where should all the flirting lead to, Mr Gatiss?

If resolving the gay subtext was not the intention, I still don’t understand what the overarching narrative arc was. Great -> good? Didn’t sherlock show that journey in s3 already, applied to the only person through which it happened at all? (But then we also have his kindness towards molly, “I hope you’ll be very happy molly hooper)

To me that already happened in s3, in abundance. I still don’t see the necessity of introducing a secret mad sister who tortured and abused him just so he can forgive her in the end, serving a character development that already happened?