A “Skeptical Board” to Advocate Innovation

Digital BoDs with the right dose of “doubt” are real critical thinkers who can ask deep questions: Asking good and pertinent questions are critical for governing changes and trigger innovation, so the directors would have to be able to quickly assess any numbers and facts they are given, against applicable benchmarks and detect relevant hints for further questioning or confirmation. Critical Thinker BoDs do not just ask one or two random questions, they ask in a structural way continually. Because Critical Thinking implies the systematic methodology and logical analysis, and even an embedded creativity, employing and applying the criteria deemed appropriate by the thinkers involved, to arrive at the tangible and reproducible truth, either as the commonly accepted objective, or testable, measurable, and time-bound reality. Critical Thinking as an iterative process leads to a series of refinements based on learning and experience.
BoDs with positive doubt or skepticism triggers creativity and stimulates innovation: The constructive skepticism leads to creative problems-solving and innovative solutions. It often challenge conventional thinking as a sole path; add the new perspective via intuition; remove reactive thinking and negative self-talk, and add proactive interaction no matter what is the situation; remove stereotypical thinking and add intuitive listening to capture the important information for decision-making. Asking the right questions helps validate how thorough and deep the board is thinking on a particular issue; avoid group thinking and set the tone for building a culture of innovation. It can also assess whether they consider various different perspectives. It's always about the questions, particularly to come up with thei new perspective to solve a problem or address an issue.

A skeptical board has both ‘Fresh Eyes’ and ‘Inquisitive Minds,” to see things differently. The “skeptical BoD” is often someone who has a specialty in something but is not tied to the tyranny of expertise, so they can ask open questions and bring new perspectives for improving board dynamic and effectiveness.
Follow us at: @Pearl_Zhu
Published on December 16, 2016 23:18
No comments have been added yet.