Taking the Scenic Route

This week's blog post centers around a rarely discussed fiction construct. First though, I'd like to establish a middle ground between elusive facts and lazy opinions both of which can rephrase Newton's 3rd Law of Motion: for every expert there is an equal and opposite expert. I'll label this midpoint a 'considered position' and begin discussing what I refer to as 'prop writing'.

Scenes are essential to any novel but since I don't write literary fiction (I've read many discussions of it and still am not sure what it is) I spend minimal time describing the props they contain.

Novels evolved at a time when only royalty and armies ever ventured more than 10 miles from their place of birth. Books permitted the only opportunity to 'travel' and so writers engaged in lengthy descriptions of the visited milieu. We've inherited this writing form almost intact and it still fills many a page within the modern novel. The hero/heroine crests a hill, descending into a jungle. Let the detailed narration begin.

But everyone reading this post has a vast, visual library accumulated over a lifetime of television, movie, and of late, web viewing that a novelist should take advantage of. Add a few adjectives (steamy, dark, vine-filled) to jungle and a reader can draw from any number of mentally stored images to immediately fill in the rest.

Often, however, a richer view of what the reader should see is essential but loading a few paragraphs filled with descriptive narration slows the action, dulls the suspense, dims the drama. Instead, intersperse environmental details with the character's actions. Interrupt dialogue with the need to clamber over a fallen, moss-slick tree from which startled insects leap. Halt a machete from slicing the hanging vine that slithers into a snake. Stop the heroine's reflections with a shrieking howl from the leafy overhang. By the time the scene's purpose begins, the reader will be filled with vivid imagery, an immediacy of presence, and a sense the story 'moves'.

Now, boring page-filler or padded word count is one thing. Deliberate detail quite another. Consider the following.

Mary never tired gazing out her kitchen window. The riot of color approached something she sensed as divine. Swollen, eager rosebuds needed just days to burst into crimson bloom. Pale, pink peonies swayed to a gentle breeze. Orange, yellow, purple pansies laughed and danced, bumping against snapdragons that scowled before joining the festive mood. She closed her eyes, breathing the pungent, musky, mulch spread across the flower beds. It masked the death stench of corpses rotting beneath.

As an ex-soldier, I've adapted a well-appreciated military dictum to guide my scene and prop writing. He who defends everything, defends nothing can be rewritten as he who details everything, details nothing. Indeed, my sparse, spare descriptions of a street, a bedroom, a hallway (note that each unadorned noun, of its own, evoked an image) serve a greater purpose. When I do begin to include detail essential to the scene that extends even to props, the reader's alert level rises. With heightened anticipation, the suspense pulses.

Beware of movie tricks, however. Don't provide rare detail and then make the noise only a banging door, or the scratching a scurrying mouse. Delivering on the raised suspense serves to heighten it when the detail begins anew seven chapters later. Making the echoing plunk a leaky faucet diminishes a novelist's credibility. Indeed, the only thing raised will be a reader's scorn and annoyance.

As I said, this is nothing more than a considered position. Not dogma, but not offhand opinion either. I joined GR with the hope interaction with other novelists would improve my writing and provide deeper insights into how to do so. Are there other perspectives describing scenes and their included props?

As always, I welcome your thoughts and comments.
3 likes ·   •  7 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on October 14, 2016 21:48
Comments Showing 1-7 of 7 (7 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by E.G. (new)

E.G. Manetti Interesting blog. What brought this on?


message 2: by Rafael (new)

Rafael Thanx, EG !!

I do appreciate that among my very cherished indie colleagues mine might be a voice crying in the wilderness. But I continue to harbor the forlorn, perhaps hopeless and unrealistic ambition I can improve my writing enough to convince a literary agent to do all this #$!&?!#@§¿%*€^<£ editing, proofreading, and marketing for me !!

To do so (amongst other things), I must show a respect for industry standards and an understanding of business realities. These are their word count suggestions.

Mysteries/Thrillers/Suspense: 70 to 90k. Mainstream Romance: 70 to 100k. Regency, Inspirational, Suspense, and Paranormal Romance have a minimum of 40k. Fantasy 90 to 100k. Paranormal: 70 to 90k. Horror: 80 to 100k. Sci-Fi: 90 to 125k. Historical: 100 to 120k. YA: 50 to 80k. Middle Grade: 25 to 40k. Novellas: 20 to 50k. Short Stories: 1 to 8k.

Since my stories incorporate elements of many genres, I've settled on @90k as a reasonable limit and therefore have to not only write efficiently, but make pragmatic decisions about what to leave in and perhaps more importantly, what to leave out.

Scenes and their props are a big area for bloat. I hoped to learn if others had a different approach. Or, have I arrived late to a writing stage you guys left long ago ??


message 3: by E.G. (new)

E.G. Manetti I do so much world building for the 12 Systems that scene props can be really important to give a sense of time and place. It is also essential for things like spaceships. I tend to worry more about 'distraction' than word count, so I'm always trying to find ways to work the description in without long descriptive passages.

That said, the 'industry' word count standards get broken all the time - although not with impunity. Patricia Briggs' first Mercy Thompson (Urban Fantasy) was right around 90K. Her latest, is closer to 120K. I suspect that a successful writer can get more words because sales cover the cost of the more expensive print run.

For those of us who are predominantly e-book, a little more latitude is possible, but common sense is important. It's not simply the words, but the pacing. My books, so far: Volume - 93K, Book 2- 130K, and book 3 a whopping 145K after a ruthless reduction of 15K words. I simply didn't think anything written by an obscure indie justified 500+ pages printed. The current effort is ~140K and needs to lose 5-10K. Not because of industry standards but because the momentum in the first few chapters is dragging - and that will have readers dumping the book faster than word/page count.

On going mainstream, fitting to norms is important. I also suspect an established reader base will get a book agents attention. If a few hundred people consistently read your books, then that suggests the issue is marketing not quality.


message 4: by Rafael (new)

Rafael As always, EG, you make such good points, I have to really think about them. Here's my question. What is world building? When it comes to fiction, there is a difference between construction and description. And if description becomes a substitute for construction, the story suffers.

For example, a character views a wall. Unless the plot demands otherwise, I won't go beyond informing the reader it is 'weathered, gray concrete'. Pure description, done, I move on.

Or I could have a character walking along and he bumps nose first into a wall that appears out of nowhere. He steps back and the wall fades. He steps closer and the wall appears. This is world building. It required no description of the wall and I suspect the reader's attention is riveted.

No matter how awesome the spaceship or fantastical the landscape, everyone has seen an Imperial Battle Cruiser or Tatooine's bleak landscape. Especially in a world of instant on and instant access, we novelists would do well to emulate short story writers, who without scenes and props to provide a crutch, must tell a story.


message 5: by E.G. (new)

E.G. Manetti Rafael wrote: "As always, EG, you make such good points... No matter how awesome the spaceship or fantastical the landscape, everyone has seen an Imperial Battle Cruiser or Tatooine's bleak landscape. Especially in a world of instant on and instant access, we novelists would do well to emulate short story writers, who without scenes and props to provide a crutch, must tell a story. ..."

And the alternate expert, my story editor/movie producer (The Cell among others) busted me sideways for skimping on the description of the spaceship! :D

That said, I think you made the point I didn't quite get. 'weathered, gray concrete'. It's not only a wall, it's outside, its utilitarian and its been there a while. Unless we're discussing Hadrian's wall, that works. Nice one.


message 6: by George (new)

George Excellent post, Rafael. I guess you could say I am a minimalist when it comes to scene and props. I never thought of why that was until I read your post. I like your theory…we all have a large library of images stored in our memory banks…makes perfect sense. To use your example, I know what a jungle looks like…you don’t need to describe every leaf and vine.
What really drives my writing style is my personal reading habits. I agree that too many descriptors slow down the plot. In fact, I find if the author starts to string together paragraph on paragraph of description, I get frustrated. That leads me to skip the remaining text until I get back to the action or some dialogue. This makes me feel guilty, because I assume the author has agonized over every word like I do. I feel like I am disrespecting him or her…but I do it anyway! I further assume that I am not the only one who does this…could be wrong there. Since I don’t want readers skipping large portions of my work, I try to make every word count. Less is more.
Sometimes minimalism is easier said than done. My novel is focused around aviation, so I felt the need to do some explaining of basic aerodynamic principles. (I think this would apply to any technology based novel). I accomplished this via dialogue…I had a pilot character explain to a non-pilot character the what and why of what he was doing. The results have been mixed. Most find the insight interesting, but some others find it annoying…I want a novel not a book about how to fly an airplane. File that under the category, “You can’t please everyone.”


message 7: by Rafael (last edited Oct 16, 2016 10:36PM) (new)

Rafael You keep right on skipping, George. A writer who fills a novel with extraneous/excessive detail is disrespectful of readers and their time. I don't think I'd be too far out on a limb to say readers, as a market, have to be among the most sophisticated. People who read are of above-average intelligence. And the converse is equally true.

Writers who feel they must explain or describe everything insult the reader with blatant condescension and are probably adrift in a sea of telling. The decision to describe or explain any aspect of a story is an easy one. Does it advance the plot toward the climax?

An agent, whose name will remain lost in obscurity because of my porous memory, once wrote about explanatory text, "You can't become a serious writer until you're prepared to murder your darlings."


back to top