date
newest »

message 1:
by
E.G.
(new)
Oct 16, 2016 05:49AM

reply
|
flag

I do appreciate that among my very cherished indie colleagues mine might be a voice crying in the wilderness. But I continue to harbor the forlorn, perhaps hopeless and unrealistic ambition I can improve my writing enough to convince a literary agent to do all this #$!&?!#@§¿%*€^<£ editing, proofreading, and marketing for me !!
To do so (amongst other things), I must show a respect for industry standards and an understanding of business realities. These are their word count suggestions.
Mysteries/Thrillers/Suspense: 70 to 90k. Mainstream Romance: 70 to 100k. Regency, Inspirational, Suspense, and Paranormal Romance have a minimum of 40k. Fantasy 90 to 100k. Paranormal: 70 to 90k. Horror: 80 to 100k. Sci-Fi: 90 to 125k. Historical: 100 to 120k. YA: 50 to 80k. Middle Grade: 25 to 40k. Novellas: 20 to 50k. Short Stories: 1 to 8k.
Since my stories incorporate elements of many genres, I've settled on @90k as a reasonable limit and therefore have to not only write efficiently, but make pragmatic decisions about what to leave in and perhaps more importantly, what to leave out.
Scenes and their props are a big area for bloat. I hoped to learn if others had a different approach. Or, have I arrived late to a writing stage you guys left long ago ??

That said, the 'industry' word count standards get broken all the time - although not with impunity. Patricia Briggs' first Mercy Thompson (Urban Fantasy) was right around 90K. Her latest, is closer to 120K. I suspect that a successful writer can get more words because sales cover the cost of the more expensive print run.
For those of us who are predominantly e-book, a little more latitude is possible, but common sense is important. It's not simply the words, but the pacing. My books, so far: Volume - 93K, Book 2- 130K, and book 3 a whopping 145K after a ruthless reduction of 15K words. I simply didn't think anything written by an obscure indie justified 500+ pages printed. The current effort is ~140K and needs to lose 5-10K. Not because of industry standards but because the momentum in the first few chapters is dragging - and that will have readers dumping the book faster than word/page count.
On going mainstream, fitting to norms is important. I also suspect an established reader base will get a book agents attention. If a few hundred people consistently read your books, then that suggests the issue is marketing not quality.

For example, a character views a wall. Unless the plot demands otherwise, I won't go beyond informing the reader it is 'weathered, gray concrete'. Pure description, done, I move on.
Or I could have a character walking along and he bumps nose first into a wall that appears out of nowhere. He steps back and the wall fades. He steps closer and the wall appears. This is world building. It required no description of the wall and I suspect the reader's attention is riveted.
No matter how awesome the spaceship or fantastical the landscape, everyone has seen an Imperial Battle Cruiser or Tatooine's bleak landscape. Especially in a world of instant on and instant access, we novelists would do well to emulate short story writers, who without scenes and props to provide a crutch, must tell a story.

And the alternate expert, my story editor/movie producer (The Cell among others) busted me sideways for skimping on the description of the spaceship! :D
That said, I think you made the point I didn't quite get. 'weathered, gray concrete'. It's not only a wall, it's outside, its utilitarian and its been there a while. Unless we're discussing Hadrian's wall, that works. Nice one.

What really drives my writing style is my personal reading habits. I agree that too many descriptors slow down the plot. In fact, I find if the author starts to string together paragraph on paragraph of description, I get frustrated. That leads me to skip the remaining text until I get back to the action or some dialogue. This makes me feel guilty, because I assume the author has agonized over every word like I do. I feel like I am disrespecting him or her…but I do it anyway! I further assume that I am not the only one who does this…could be wrong there. Since I don’t want readers skipping large portions of my work, I try to make every word count. Less is more.
Sometimes minimalism is easier said than done. My novel is focused around aviation, so I felt the need to do some explaining of basic aerodynamic principles. (I think this would apply to any technology based novel). I accomplished this via dialogue…I had a pilot character explain to a non-pilot character the what and why of what he was doing. The results have been mixed. Most find the insight interesting, but some others find it annoying…I want a novel not a book about how to fly an airplane. File that under the category, “You can’t please everyone.”

Writers who feel they must explain or describe everything insult the reader with blatant condescension and are probably adrift in a sea of telling. The decision to describe or explain any aspect of a story is an easy one. Does it advance the plot toward the climax?
An agent, whose name will remain lost in obscurity because of my porous memory, once wrote about explanatory text, "You can't become a serious writer until you're prepared to murder your darlings."