Rescuing your first novel from under your bed

So, I was on the “Rescuing your ‘trunk novel'” panel at Archon, where I was somewhat surprised to find that the three other panelists — Elizabeth Donald, Henry Melton, and “Tex” Thompson — have also successfully rescued, revised, re-polished, and published some of their very early work. I thought that was fairly rare, but I guess it’s far from unheard of.


Tex Thompson evidently writes weird westerns, btw, plus she was hilarious as a co-panelist and did a particularly good job moderating, so I expect I will check out something of hers.


Anyway, as might be expected, we were all quite different in just exactly how we conceptualize “rescuing” a “trunk novel.” For example, Elizabeth described how she expanded an early short story that didn’t work into a novel that did work. Hah, totally the opposite of me cutting down a massive 1500 pp trilogy into first one and then another standalone novel.


I want to talk more about that here, including a detailed summary of just what went where. It was tricky to think how to talk about this; after all I don’t want to hand you a lot of spoilers for both the resultant books. Here is a list of important characters and elements from the original manuscript, in nonspecific trope form:


Important Elements of the Original 1500 pp Trilogy


The Village Girl

The Dog

The Mysterious Sorcerer

The Ghost Boy

The Best Friend

The Nice Boy from a Good Family

The Retired Soldier

Witches

Ghosts


The Responsible Princess

Her Brother, a Prince

Her Father, a King

Her Best Friend

The Wolf Duke

His Seneschal

The Evil Nobleman


The Prince Who Never Expected to be Heir

His Father, the Mad King

His Sister (deceased, a ghost)

The Clever Nobleman

The Lord of Thieves


The Fortunate God and the Quiet God

The Blue Priests and the White Priests

The Genii Locorum (spirits of places)


The Antagonist


A Basically Coherent Plot (With Significant Flaws)


Conveniently, that is 25 elements plus a plot. Twenty-five is such an nice, easy number to work with and remember. I didn’t do that on purpose, though. The above is just a list of all the important elements I could think of, sorted out in groups by which of the three protagonists they were particularly associated with. Now, on the panel, we discussed our various reclamation processes, and of course handled this in different ways.


Mine was basically … look, you know how sculptors sometimes say they carve away the part of the stone that isn’t part of the statue? Well, I started by deleting huge swathes of text that weren’t part of the new book I had in mind. Remember the idea was to turn an overlong trilogy into a single book. So this part was all about deciding which of the three protagonists was going to be THE protagonist, and then choosing the elements that would stay in her story. This was a fun destructive take-an-ax-to-it kind of process, the sort of thing that doesn’t take very long initially, so you can do it without actually committing to a real revision. (Less fun was carving away the pieces I thought were part of the story, that turned out not to be. But that came (much) later.)


So, taking the resulting books in publication order, here is —


The White Road of the Moon, coming out March 2017:


The Village Girl

The Dog

The Mysterious Sorcerer

The Ghost Boy

The Best Friend

The Retired Soldier

Witches

Ghosts


The prince who never expected to be heir was retained, though in vastly changed form.

So was his sister, the ghost, somewhat less altered.


A handful of new elements were naturally added, including a pretty snazzy horse (okay, sort of a horse) and a new antagonist.


And the plot started off looking the same but rapidly went off in a different direction.


That’s it. If you count, you will find that roughly 40% of the elements from the original trilogy were conserved in this story. Everything else was stripped away, mostly in the very early stages of the revision process, but some much later. I practically cried when I carved away the gods and the priests. I *really* liked those aspects of the story. They were there for a long time. But the story was too long and too complicated and finally I sent it to my agent saying Please help me cut this. And she said, I love some of these characters and I’m sure you can use them elsewhere, but this one and that one can vanish entirely from this story and then you can go straight from point B to point G without passing through C-F in between.


She was right. This cut was dreadful, but it worked.


In the end, about 1/3 of the resulting standalone novel was taken from the original trilogy. The first 150 pp or so are almost unchanged, just lightly revised. A few other extended scenes were retained, though with the pov character changing and other quite substantial revisions.


The climactic scenes changed a lot (after all, different antagonist), but a lot of my favorite sentences and paragraphs were conserved.


Okay, next:


The Dark Turn of Winter (title may change), an adult fantasy now set in quite a different world, due out November 2017


The Responsible Princess

Her Brother, a Prince

Her Father, a King

Her Best Friend

The Wolf Duke

His Seneschal

The Evil Nobleman


The Mad King


The Genii Locorum, now called Immanent Powers


The Antagonist


The Basic Plot, revised, including a different take on the gods. Also, much of the original geography.


Various new elements, including really scary dragons.


Okay, so how about that? That’s again about 40% of the original elements. I would estimate that for this book, close to 2/3 of the final story was taken from the original trilogy. A whole lot of pov scenes were added for The Brother and especially for The Wolf Duke, but the Responsible Princess’s plotline and most of her scenes are very closely based on the original trilogy. However, for this one, there was fairly extensive revisions and additions to practically everything.


The Antagonist and basic plot were heavily revised, but conserved.


How much trouble was all this revision? Enough that it is pretty comparable to writing two brand-new books. But writing these two was fun, a different kind of fun than I normally enjoy when writing. Seeing some of what I’d done badly in the original trilogy was educational. Seeing that my sentences and paragraphs were already good and worth lifting into a new story was actually very satisfying. Pulling coherent new plots together was interesting, and since plotting is hard for me, it was a relief to have so much of that already done, especially for the latter book.


The most painful part was cutting the important Blue Priest and everything associated with him. I’m now wondering if he might not be an important supporting character in a new project in the next year or two. Also the Thief Lord, who was a great favorite of mine. I’ve always had a really soft spot for thieves in fantasy. Well, we’ll see what I can do with them later.


Next up! Well, or sometime in the not too distant future, maybe. I would like to try rescuing my very first science fiction novel, actually a huge unwieldy duology that honestly I don’t think is all that well-written but has some great elements in it. A lot of it could be conserved, including all the important characters and some of the basic plot. I think.


Anyway, I certainly am happy that I never threw away that original fantasy trilogy. YMMV, but I suggest just tossing your early work in a drawer (or the virtual equivalent) and coming back to it in ten years, just in case you also find a rescue project worthwhile.


Please Feel Free to Share: Facebook twitter google_plus reddit pinterest linkedin tumblr mail
 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on October 05, 2016 07:05
No comments have been added yet.