Holy Transcendence–Anarchy by Another Name

A few years ago, a nearby church in my denomination decided to buck the system. They chose to go against something that had long been held, formalized, ratified, and institutionalized. It was a bold move, to say the least.

The revolt (if I may call it that) was in an area of belief and understanding that is still a hot-button issue today. Ultimately, in my opinion, it will cause the demise of our denomination. It’s that divisive.

“I applaud their courage…”

While the battle still rages, my attention is drawn to some of the rhetoric that surrounds the controversy. The congregation I pointed to earlier voted by an overwhelming margin (almost unanimously) to rise up against the system. One of the terms used for their action was “holy transcendence.”

While I disagree with their decision, I applaud their courage to stand upon what they believe to be true. What I cannot applaud is the description of their deed.

With a short, two-word term, they were placed above the fray. Their position (at least by perception) was elevated to one of “we’re right, and everyone else is wrong.” Whether it was meant that way or not, on the surface at least, it smacked of arrogance.

I point this out not to pick on our sister congregation, but to draw attention to a much larger issue. We’ve become very good at manipulating language to place ourselves in the best possible light. It’s become known as “spin.” I catch myself doing it all the time. It almost seems natural—second nature.

It’s one thing when politicians do it. That’s bad enough. But when we adopt that practice as Christians…look out!

“Holy transcendence” is a really clever term. I could use that baby to excuse a lot of things. I may have to try it sometime.

“A lesbian trapped in a man’s body…”

It reminds me of something a well-known radio host said in my hearing years ago. He simply stated that he was “a lesbian trapped in a man’s body.” Just think of the things such a person could excuse with that one. I’ve been using it as a joke ever since.

Holy transcendence is much like that. If my denomination wants me to do something (or avoid something) and I disagree with it, I can sweetly pronounce my defiance as holy transcendence. The more honest approach would be to simply say, “I’m out of here.” Of course,   if an entire congregation says that (as opposed to an individual), it becomes a major deal. In essence, it becomes anarchy.

Anarchy is certainly a strong term, but so is holy transcendence. The difference is that the former sounds cold and obtrusive. The later sounds lofty and spiritual.

It seems to me, honesty and humility would cause one to say, “We strongly disagree, and after much prayer and reflection, we must part ways.” I realize there are lots of reasons to avoid that sort of daring action, but there are just as many to avoid using terms like “holy transcendence.” Just a thought…

 

[Dave Zuchelli is a graduate of Pittsburgh Theological Seminary and is currently the pastor of Smith Chapel, in Great Falls, VA.]

The post appeared first on Dave Zuchelli.