I'm Khan

"My name is khan and I'm not a terrorist."
But Mr. Khan, Google it and you shall realise that all terrorists are either Khans, Masoods, Afzals or Syeds. Shocking but true. 
However, the bigger question still lurks somewhere in the shadows—how many deaths would it take us to accept this fact? The dastardly attack in Kenya, by Muslim terrorists has proved yet again that the menace of this failed religion is assuming overarching consequences. In a new world order, there is technology, growth, innovations, prosperity, but for some obscure reason this one religion can’t think beyond AK-47. God forbid, if this unfortunate incident would have happened in India, the pseudo seculars—Shabana Azami, Javed Akhtar, Amir khan, Teesta, Arvind Kejriwal and the entire ‘red bindi’ brigade along with hate mongers like Owasis of the world would have pronounced it to be a retaliatory action by the Muslims against the anti-Muslim venom being spewed by the Hindu organizations. 
Imagine the strength of character of our country, where outright  Muslim fundamentalists; Shabana Aazmi and Javed Akhtar, cleverly disguised under their garb of designer sarees and kurtas, shamelessly strut wearing their “Secular” and ‘Nationalist” mask and get applauded for the same. Sure, fighting for the cause of Shorabbudin could not be a mark of a true nationalist.  I wish if someone could just slap them tight on a TV show. If I happen to be on one of them, well, my dreams would come true.
Am I biased? Am I pro Hindu? Am I a Muslim hater? Well, the questions seem similar but they are very different from each other. Let me answer them sequentially. The twin tower attack, the attack on Indian parliament, the Mumbai blast, attack on Mumbai, the Kenya massacre and the ever increasing nuisance of this race has made me look at this religion in a new light. 
Am I Pro-Hindu? Yes, I am proud to be a Hindu. Can you hold it against me? Can any one debate on the ‘sanatan’ lineage of this religion? Have you ever heard Hindus killing people basis religion, creating terror, conspiring against the state? Never. Yes, I believe that Hinduism is a way of life. It teaches tolerance, co-existence. If you ask me, like million others ‘I’m an angry Hindu who hates my religion for being so lenient. Why can’t we get up, unite and for once tell the world at large that our compassion should not be mistaken for our cowardice. We do have strong arms to carry the weight of AK47 and 56.
My uncle married a Muslim and that too in 1960s.  Being staunch Hindu household, there was a commotion. But then our large hearted approach and 'easily compromised' religion belief made us accept her. I love my aunt, her brother who happens to be my mother’s rakhi brother too, his family and loads of other Muslims.  I love their contribution to music, art, culture and history and India. Love their cuisine, their distinct sense of style. But now all this has been overshadowed by the nebulous sheet of despicable actions and thoughts of the Muslim satraps. Talk to any Muslim and he is angry.  Angry with system, the governance, the nuisance of living as Muslims in a world which is clearly hostile towards them and the never ending debate of anti-pro Islam.  
What I fond strange is that a desolate building, out of nowhere, treated as church gets vandalized and the entire media starts a witch hunt; not against the perpetrators, but entire Hindu religion, every Hindu organization and every single Hindu leader. But when a large scale violence is committed by Muslims, it is always about the terrorists and the Muslim religion “my name is khan and I’m not a terrorist.” Why this double speak? Are Hindus punching bags? Or are they the best way to increase the TRP? Look at parochial and completely out of tune anchors like Arnab. This guy has the audacity to demand resignation of everyone over his boorish and chaotic talk shows. Mr. Goswami, you are watched because of the crass entertainment value, not news.
Choosing between the devil and the deep sea, I would have more respect for Akbaruddin Owasi who claim to be fanatics and speak the same lingo. At least, there is synch between his point of view and action agenda. It is the pseudo secular bastards who pose clear and the present danger. They should be whacked whenever they open their mouth. The moment they seek refuge under the much abused freedom of speech right, they ought to be whacked again, this time harder, telling them that voicing anti national sentiments amounts to treason. Ban them from talk shows, public gatherings and social platform.
And solution to the larger problem? Well, first let’s accept that we have a real time problem.  


 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on April 03, 2015 00:53
No comments have been added yet.