A Disgusting Barefaced Lie

A number of people have called me to ask my opinion on the constitutional changes which have been submitted to the British National Party's General Members' Meeting this coming weekend.

The questions have all essentially revolved around one point: are the proposals in line with the constitution which I drew up?

The short answer is no.

They have nothing at all in common with the proposals I submitted to the constitutional review committee, discussed in person with Nick Griffin, submitted to the December 2010 conference and which were approved by that conference.

It is disgraceful that an agreement to have a debate procedure on some of the finer points of the constitution has now been misrepresented to say that carte blanche was given to change the core proposals.

There was never any such suggestion.

The video evidence which has been released on Andrew Brons's site and on the official party website confirm this in detail.

Furthermore, it is obvious that the procedure for further review of the proposals has not been followed, and that completely new proposals have been plucked from the air and presented as being "in line" with those accepted at the conference.

It is a disgusting barefaced lie to make this claim.

I can only hope that decent and honest members of the party see that they are being lied to on a grand scale.

They must come to the General Members Meeting and vote down this outrage. To leave the party in the hands of people who can unashamedly tell such brazen lies would be a tragedy.