Deaths of a crusader and a queen

May 19, 1102 was the day that Stephen, the Count of Blois, was slain at the battle of Ramleh. Stephen appears briefly in the prologue of Saints, as he tries to explain to his five year old son and namesake that his wife, the Countess Adela, daughter of the Conqueror, is insisting he return to the Holy Land to regain the honor she thinks he lost by abandoning the siege of Antioch. I found myself sympathizing with Stephen’s plight, both for being unfairly accused of cowardice and for being wed to Adela. She prevailed, as she usually did, and her husband redeemed his “lost honor” by his death at Ramleh. Here is a touching and very personal letter that Stephen wrote to his wife before the siege of Antioch.
http://mw.mcmaster.ca/scriptorium/ste...
I seem unable to keep the Tudors from crashing the party this month, for I have to mention that on May 19th, 1536, Anne Boleyn was murdered in the Tower of London by her husband, who went riding off to court Jane Seymour as soon as the cannons sounded to assure him that his unwanted wife was no longer a hindrance to his plans for a third marriage.
14 likes ·   •  14 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on May 20, 2016 11:37
Comments Showing 1-14 of 14 (14 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Therese (new)

Therese Until reading your books, I only knew about the Tudors and not all that much. I definitely prefer Henry, Eleanor, and their Devils brood. Of course I might be a little biased, but that would be your fault :-)


message 2: by Sharon (new)

Sharon I'll gladly take the blame, Therese. :-) I think the Plantagenets in general and the Angevins in particular are much more interesting than the Tudors.


message 3: by Therese (new)

Therese *A big grin*

I just hate to leave them behind on my journey.


message 4: by Sharon (new)

Sharon I am really going to miss writing about the Angevins, Therese. That is another reason why I want to continue with my mystery series; at least there I'd get to write about Eleanor and her sons.


message 5: by Therese (new)

Therese I wish you would continue on right through to today :-)

One of these days I'm going to have to check out that other series of yours. Still, so many books, so little time…


message 6: by Anne (new)

Anne I have just finished A King's Ransom and much as I loved the book it was not easy to finish knowing what the end would be but worth it to know what really happened while Richard was a hostage to Henrich and what a nasty piece of work he was. Have read all your books now except the mystery series so look forward to reading them.


message 7: by Sharon (new)

Sharon Thank you so much, Anne. You brought some sunshine into my day and since it is pouring rain here, it was most welcome.


message 8: by Elyse✨ (new)

Elyse✨ So Sharon, you're not going to continue the Angevin saga with John as king? (I just finished a King's Ransom too.) Or is it too painful to contemplate?


message 9: by Sharon (new)

Sharon I already wrote about John's reign in Here Be Dragons, Elyse. As much as I love writing about him, there is nothing new for me to say. :-(


message 10: by Elyse✨ (new)

Elyse✨ Well, now I'm embarrassed because I read Here Be Dragons back in August of 1996 (I keep a list of books I've read) and totally forgot. I will go back and re-read it now that I've got a better sense of where he fits into the Angevin picture.


message 11: by Sharon (new)

Sharon Twenty years is a long time to remember the details of a book, Elyse, so you're off the hook! If you read Lionheart and A King;'s Ransom, you know that my research caused me to dismiss the legend that Richard I was gay. But I wrote Dragons back in the 1980's and since Richard appeared in only one scene of that book, I didn't bother to research him in depth, just resorted to one biography. I later became much more obsessive-compulsive about my research, in part due to this mistake---for I've had to spend so much time explaining to my readers why he was not gay in Lionheart and Ransom but was in Dragons. :-( Otherwise, I think my research for Dragons has held up over the years.


message 12: by Terelyn (new)

Terelyn Marks Here Be Dragons is definitely worth re-reading!


message 13: by Sharon (new)

Sharon Thanks, Teelyn. I confess it is my own favorite of my books. After Sunne, it was so nice to have characters still alive at the end of the book! Also, Dragons began my love affair with Wales.


message 14: by RJay (new)

RJay HI Sharon-
I'm still bummed that you're leaving the Plantagenets but it's nice to know that you'll be writing more mysteries. Will you keep de Quincy or move on to new pastures?


back to top

Sharon Kay Penman's Blog

Sharon Kay Penman
Sharon Kay Penman isn't a Goodreads Author (yet), but they do have a blog, so here are some recent posts imported from their feed.
Follow Sharon Kay Penman's blog with rss.