What’s Wrong with the Redskins

In this country we don’t ban “Mein Kampf,” Ku Klux Klan screeds, or objectionable terms for racial groups. It is clear that the government cannot disallow offensive or hateful speech. But the federal trademark law, known as the Lanham Act, has since 1946 barred the registration of marks that may disparage “persons, living or dead, institutions, beliefs, or national symbols, or bring them into contempt, or disrepute.” In 2014, after nearly half a century of registering and renewing “The Redskins,” the government cancelled the football team’s trademark registrations, on the grounds that the name may be disparaging to Native Americans. The cancellation does not ban the team’s use of the name. Instead, it does away with the legal presumption that the team has the exclusive right to use the name in commerce, thus providing a substantial incentive for the Redskins—and other groups—to avoid using a name that may be considered offensive.

See the rest of the story at newyorker.com

Related:
The Chicago Police, Race, and the Legacy of Bettie Jones
Racial Discrimination and Capital Punishment: The Indefensible Death Sentence of Duane Buck
Me Gusta Trump: Portrait of a Hispanic Trump Voter
 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on May 14, 2016 21:00
No comments have been added yet.


George Packer's Blog

George Packer
George Packer isn't a Goodreads Author (yet), but they do have a blog, so here are some recent posts imported from their feed.
Follow George Packer's blog with rss.