It sounds a bit odd to say that Bill Gates is going to need a check from the government to keep him comfortable when he retires, so some form of "means-testing" is often proposed as a Social Security cure-all. There's something to this idea, but as Kathy Ruffing points out benefits for rich people amounts for a very small slice of overall Social Security spending:
This reflects the fact that not that many people are rich, and Social Security contributions are capped at around the $100k income level. If I had my druthers, I really wouldn't cut Social Security at all. If you're going reduce future tax increases by means-testing something, the thing to do is to impose Jason Furman-style cost sharing on Medicare so that it has a deductible that's defined as a share of income. But still under that plan you'd be meaningfully reducing benefits for middle class people in order to save any meaningful amount of money.
Published on March 15, 2011 11:29