It is often said, and it appears to be true, that Hillary Clinton is more hawkish on foreign policy than President Obama. But what sort of hawk is she? And, if she were to be elected to the White House, how would her approach differ from Obama’s? Thanks to two deeply reported pieces of journalism—one just released about Clinton, from Mark Landler, of the Times, and one from last month on Obama, by Jeffrey Goldberg, of The Atlantic—we now have more information to help us answer these questions.
See the rest of the story at newyorker.com
Related:
The Anti-Moneyball ElectionTrump Reassures Supporters That He Still Opposes Women Who Were Born WomenHillary Clinton Should Be Allowed to Boast
Published on April 22, 2016 04:00