Someone in the media or science worlds correctly characterizing ID is such a rare occurrence that when it happens, I get a surreal feeling, as if it were all just a sweet dream that will soon dissipate with the crowing of the alarm clock. That was my response on reading Tom Gilson's post at The Stream, commenting on the recent debate at the University of Toronto between Stephen Meyer and Lawrence Krauss. Check this out:
In his opening statement Meyer defined ID as the idea that certain featu...
Published on April 04, 2016 15:03