I was flattered to learn that Richard Dawkins felt it necessary to come to the aid of his friend Lawrence Krauss in Krauss's dispute with me about whether the evolutionary process depends upon an ineliminable element of randomness. How odd, however, that Professor Dawkins would weigh in for the purpose of defending an obviously incomplete and therefore, indefensible caricature of the standard neo-Darwinian evolutionary mechanism. In review of my talk at last Saturday's debate at Wycliffe Col...
Published on March 25, 2016 15:45