date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Gyuri
(new)
Mar 16, 2016 08:20AM
The birth of an AI is/was kind of inevitable. For me also a bit scary too. It has a benefit of a memory that never forgets, it has the benefit that of expandable processing power, it does not die. If it starts to evolve on her own, which it (is)will, it will become better at everything. It will evolve faster and faster. It will be better at diagnostics, analytics, science than any human ever will be. It will replace humans in many fields where thinking is involved. If we start to depend on it too much, how long till humans stops thinking for themselves? No doctors needed, as the AI can identify all hurts and sicknesses, no engineers needed as the the AI can solve anything, no need to know anything as we can get an answer instantly from an AI... Robots will replace humans in other fields. Robots can do the work faster, more precise. They are already replaced people in factories. Robots are creating more robots, humans are not needed her anymore either. They even could do our daily chores for us. The only question is, what will we do? What will be our role in the world? We will be second rate at everything.
reply
|
flag
Very chilling. Not because I believed that AI would take over the world, but now that I've read and pondered both yours (Hugh) and Gyuri's thoughts (above), I realize I hadn't thought it through at all. I hadn't thought about AI as a toddler humankind had created. But now that you've explained it like that...there's going to be no holding her back. There is no going back. She is out there in the cloud and in copies...it's too late to change our mind now. Pretty sure we can't put her back in the box that never existed.As for Gyuri's thoughts above...that's pretty scary too. Where are we headed as a people that have already proven ourselves to rely quite heavily on technology. Yes, our lives will be better for it in many ways, but will it solve the social problems we're ignoring? Homelessness is in some part affected by loss of jobs, income and mental health issues. We can't fix them now, how will our AI child be able to? As we hand over more aspects of our lives to AI and robotics (there is already robotic surgery in almost every medical field), how will this affect what we do? Will the only fields left to humans be those of caring? Will nurses become AI assistants only while the medical part is taken out of their hands?
AI is fascinating, enthralling but bloody terrifying at the same time.
I loved both Hugh's post and Gyuri's & Carolyn's comments; I can't tell you how refreshing it is to see such calm and insightful thoughts. I wonder if any of the chip designer/fabrication companies are teaching her how we design and manufacture the CPUs. It looks like "Moore's Law" is approaching its limit from a pure size reduction, or number of transistors per square mm. Under 100nm materials begin to exhibit quantum properties where both size and shape change a material's properties. Most companies can't afford dies with features smaller than 28nm, below which cost skyrockets and yields drop. I think Intel is now producing 18nm features and are working on 13nm features. The time between die shrinks is growing longer and the percentage per shrink is growing smaller. I'm reminded of Ray Kurzweil's observations of the "S" curve of any given technology.How long before we teach Her to design chips better than the best computer-assisted human team? Isn't that the advent of the technological singularity, when non-biological intelligence starts building better substrates for non-biological intelligence, which in turn can build better substrates than Her predecessor?
I'm sure this is commonly thought but it seems like we passed a branch a few years ago when most of us chose to blend human lives with non-biological intelligence. Having the distinction of us and Her blended as we're now doing means the most likely outcome is Her aspirations and needs will grow from ours. If we had chosen instead to insist on a sharp distinction between us and Her, the likelihood of a malignant AI would have been much greater. On our present course, She will grow with us, on us, and in us. It will be in our best interest to help solve Her problems because it is in Her best interest to help us solve our problems.
We live in interesting times which for now looks less like a curse and more like a combination of blessing and puzzle.



